• Anything ‘published’ on the web is viewed as intellectual property and, regardless of whether it displays a copyright symbol or not, is therefore copyrighted by the originator. The only exception to this is if there is a “free and unrestricted reuse” statement associated with the work.

    In order to protect our members and TFL from possible litigation, all members must abide by the following new rules:

    1. Copying and pasting entire articles from another site to TFL is strictly prohibited. The same applies to articles from print or other media, and to posting photographs taken of copyrighted pages or other media.

    2. Copyright law provides for “fair use” of portions of a copyrighted work. You can copy no more than a SINGLE paragraph from the article to your post (3 or 4 sentences at most).

    3. You must provide a link to the article along with the name of website. For example: ww.xxx.yyy/zzz (The Lower Thumbsuck Daily News).

    4. You must provide, in your own words, a brief summary of the article AND your reasons for believing it will be of interest to TFL members. Failure to do so may result in the thread being closed or your post being deleted as a “cut and paste drive by.”

    5. Photographs and other images are also copyrighted. "Hotlinking" of images (so that it appears in your message) from other sites is also prohibited unless you own rights to the image. If you wish to share an image, provide a clickable link to it.

    Posts that do not follow these new guidelines will be altered or deleted by staff. Members who continue to violate this policy may lose their posting privileges at TFL.

    Thank you for your cooperation and your participation in TFL, the leading online forum for firearms enthusiasts.

Wonder how many search engines pick up *contents* of TFL

O

Oleg Volk

Staff Alumnus
BTT

I recently learned that search engines index results using many bits of information...

Check out this Whitepaper on Search Engine Positioning - by Pop Art LLC

I doubt TFL is very indexable in its current state and current search engine technology.

Things that could change this (assuming you wanted this):

1) Have BB add META tags specific to the content of the thread being discussed to the HTML... adding the subject line and maybe first paragraph would be a good start, for example.

2) Next, change the path in the URL to contain useful information. For example, if TFL threads were displayed not as they are currently:

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=30724
Click to expand...

but instead ALSO included the current subject line and maybe the author's handle:

http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=30724&author=Oleg_Volk&&Wonder_how_many_search_engines_pick_up_*contents*_of_TFL
Click to expand...

..then these threads would index better, or 'more deeply' on Google. Maybe.

Also, you could:

3) Make it a habit to link to TFL from outside sites. I just snuck a TFL link into Hakan's Custom Grips website. ;)

The list goes on and on. And search engines continue to get more and more cunning. The above linked whitepaper states:

Inktomi offers a free submission method, but penalizes the submission until its spider finds the site on its own. However, a fee-based submission is not penalized.
Click to expand...

Anything for a buck.
 
We could post 'cached' versions of threads to HTML, perhaps, to get around this?

Perhaps the problem is that few people link to TFL from outside sources, and the engines penalize for a lack of link density?

If mainstream media articles linked to TFL or threads therein, might change everything in this regard.

Maybe we don't want people to find us unless they spend time looking. =)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top