Will the Brady law expire?

BillX

New member
I seem to remember that the Brady law would require refunding or reaffirming or something along those lines every 5 or 10 years. Can anyone shed some light on this?

------------------
"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats." H.L. Mencken
 
The Brady Law is set to expire after ten years (some time in 2004 or 2005 -- not sure of the exact dat) however, given the current political climate, it is very likely to be renewed no matter who gets elected in November. I'm reminded of a very similar situation in NJ. The state pass very strict gun laws and the governor was vote out of office at the end of his term. The new governor (prior to being elected) promised to repeal those laws. Now, almost eight years later, those laws are still on the books and new ones have been added.
FUD
fudflag.gif
Share what you know & learn what you don't
 
Brady does not sunset. I believe you're talking about the crime bill, with the assault weapon ban on it - that sunsets; but will probably be renewed too.


Battler.
 
Why do you say it will be renewed? Can't we hope that our Prez, Bush, will veto it or the Congress won't renew it?

------------------
"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats." H.L. Mencken
 
Can anyone ever remember the last time a law or a tax was done away with ? Prohabition the last one? I know they just did some phone tax that was used to pay for or support a the Spanish American war? So with this kind of track record what do you think? :rolleyes:

------------------
We preserve our freedoms by using four boxes: soap,ballot,jury, and cartridge.
Anonymous
 
In the unlikely event of Bush being elected, he'll have his opponent for the 2004 election (Hillary) who will not stay silent while her opponent "Gives Assault Weapons made for killing large numbers of people to criminals and children".

I cannot see this vetoed.

Battler.
 
Well, with any luck he won't HAVE TO veto it; The "assault weapon" ban sunsets unless a law is enacted to extend it, and it has always been easier to block the passage of new laws through Congress, than to enact new laws. We don't need to overcome a veto, we need to win a filibuster in the Senate; 41 votes will do that.

The real challenge won't be fighting off the extention, it will be knowing when to fight. It's not like they're going to openly bring forward a single issue bill extending the ban; Not unless Congress and the White house fall into Democratic hands. They'll sneak a provision into a conference bill in the dead of the night, and not tell anybody about it until after it's been voted on. That's how they got the Lautenburg amendment enacted, after all.

There's only two ways to stop that: Either get pro-gun leadership in Congress, (The current Republican leaders obviously doesn't count!) or get the rules in Congress changed so as to make sneaking things into bills much harder. Actually, you'd probably want to do both.

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis!
 
Back
Top