Just returned from the gunshop. With S&W falling into disfavor, I've been looking at the SIGs more & more ... Looked at a P239 and a P232 side-by-side today. While the P239 is a little bit more blockier and slightly taller, it is exactly the same length as the P232. And this got me to thinking as to why anybody would buy a P232 in .380 (7+1) when they can have a P239 in 9mm Parabellum (8+1)?
Now, I recognize the fact that some people are recoil sensative and a 9mm might be too difficult for them to shoot accurately but a fuller-size (when compared to other .380 pistols) .380 pistol would do the trick.
I'm not critizing, but just trying to understand why anybody would buy a P232 IF recoil was NOT a problem?
Share what you know, learn what you don't -- FUD
Now, I recognize the fact that some people are recoil sensative and a 9mm might be too difficult for them to shoot accurately but a fuller-size (when compared to other .380 pistols) .380 pistol would do the trick.
I'm not critizing, but just trying to understand why anybody would buy a P232 IF recoil was NOT a problem?
Share what you know, learn what you don't -- FUD