I am sincerely trying not to ignite a jihad here. The problem is there may not be a good answer which will ultimately result in either no answers or bad ones so ... apologies if that's how it goes.
Since starting here many moons ago I purchased the Lee Turret Press and it's been fine for me. Nothing spectacular but I've had fun at the range. I have been considering a progressive to ramp things up a bit and there's a lot of good comparison articles out there between the Dillon, Lee and Hornady. One of my favorites so far is "Dillon vs Lee vs Hornady" by Aaron Burns.
As I look at these comparisons the relative superiority of various subsystems is often a matter of preference or small degrees. There are two areas however where both Dillon and Hornady seem to fall behind and one is primer handling. I can reload my primer system in a few seconds with a new tray, where the Dillon and Hornady both seem to use some torture device that forces one to stack them in tubes.
Why?
I think it's okay to say that there's a large difference when viewing the Lee vs the Dillon/Hornady progressives. I'll just say that large difference may be all in my head but at this point based on a few days or Internet research that seems to be the case. If that's the case then why do the other two have such slow primer handling methods? One could spend >$300 on some other gizmo to load the primer tubes but that seems even more silly when you compare the brilliant simplicity of the Lee primer handling systems.
Why are Dillon and Hornady so far behind here (possibly only in my head/opinion) especially given their premium price point?
Since starting here many moons ago I purchased the Lee Turret Press and it's been fine for me. Nothing spectacular but I've had fun at the range. I have been considering a progressive to ramp things up a bit and there's a lot of good comparison articles out there between the Dillon, Lee and Hornady. One of my favorites so far is "Dillon vs Lee vs Hornady" by Aaron Burns.
As I look at these comparisons the relative superiority of various subsystems is often a matter of preference or small degrees. There are two areas however where both Dillon and Hornady seem to fall behind and one is primer handling. I can reload my primer system in a few seconds with a new tray, where the Dillon and Hornady both seem to use some torture device that forces one to stack them in tubes.
Why?
I think it's okay to say that there's a large difference when viewing the Lee vs the Dillon/Hornady progressives. I'll just say that large difference may be all in my head but at this point based on a few days or Internet research that seems to be the case. If that's the case then why do the other two have such slow primer handling methods? One could spend >$300 on some other gizmo to load the primer tubes but that seems even more silly when you compare the brilliant simplicity of the Lee primer handling systems.
Why are Dillon and Hornady so far behind here (possibly only in my head/opinion) especially given their premium price point?