This mpeg tells the whole story.
http://www.judoinfo.com/images/video/other/whyjudoisbetterthankarate.mpg
Hee-Hee-Hee
http://www.judoinfo.com/images/video/other/whyjudoisbetterthankarate.mpg
Hee-Hee-Hee
...Why Judo is better than Karate
- Thread starter Dave3006
- Start date
- Status
All joking aside, unless weapons are involved, size makes a huge difference. I am amused at the martial artists who think it does not.
Of course, if the karate expert in our mpeg only would have used more ki and called on his famous death touch, it would have turned out much differently. Where's George Dillman when you need him?
Dave
Of course, if the karate expert in our mpeg only would have used more ki and called on his famous death touch, it would have turned out much differently. Where's George Dillman when you need him?
Dave
What a great mpeg! LMAO!
I don't come to this forum much. I have tried to visit more often, but I just don't get most of the posts. I value this BB for the firearms threads.
I spent three years in Japan and two in Korea in my youth. I studied the whole time. Keishinkan Do in Ikebukuro, Japan, as a college student, from age 17 until age 20, and Taekwan Do in Pyeoung Taek, Korea, from age 21 until age 23, as a GI. Truthfully, not much since.
Dave3006's comment about size and how he is amused at the martial artists who think it does not matter is an example of why I don't come here much. Dave, I wonder how the value of size was made so important to your understanding of the application of martial art forms. I assume you are referring to the Oriental forms.
What form or style is it you studied that taught you to understand that the size of an opponent can make such a huge difference? Do you mean all other skills being equal? Speed? Mental focus? Ability to concentrate on one muscle group? Do you think "size make a huge difference" in all cases?
I don't come to this forum much. I have tried to visit more often, but I just don't get most of the posts. I value this BB for the firearms threads.
I spent three years in Japan and two in Korea in my youth. I studied the whole time. Keishinkan Do in Ikebukuro, Japan, as a college student, from age 17 until age 20, and Taekwan Do in Pyeoung Taek, Korea, from age 21 until age 23, as a GI. Truthfully, not much since.
Dave3006's comment about size and how he is amused at the martial artists who think it does not matter is an example of why I don't come here much. Dave, I wonder how the value of size was made so important to your understanding of the application of martial art forms. I assume you are referring to the Oriental forms.
What form or style is it you studied that taught you to understand that the size of an opponent can make such a huge difference? Do you mean all other skills being equal? Speed? Mental focus? Ability to concentrate on one muscle group? Do you think "size make a huge difference" in all cases?
Sensop:
I think what Dave is saying is (correct me here if I misrepresent) that in a real unarmed fight, the size differential makes a GREATER difference that many martial artists make it out to be.
Can skill overcome the size difference? Wholeheartedly yes! However, when there is a significant size/weight differential or any other significant physical attribute disparity, the inverse skill disparity would also have to be significant to overcome the former.
I've heard too many martial art instructors go on about how "size makes no difference." Oh, yes, physical attributes (including size) do make a very significant difference - that is the reason why "combat sport" professionals try to get stronger, faster and more powerful.
That whole "with my techniques, even a small woman can beat a 250lb. gorilla" is a marketing gimmick. Serious instructors emphasize techniques AS WELL AS physical attribute development and realistic sparring.
BTW, I trained in Japan and Korea for several years as well. Nothing magical about those places...
Skorzeny
I think what Dave is saying is (correct me here if I misrepresent) that in a real unarmed fight, the size differential makes a GREATER difference that many martial artists make it out to be.
Can skill overcome the size difference? Wholeheartedly yes! However, when there is a significant size/weight differential or any other significant physical attribute disparity, the inverse skill disparity would also have to be significant to overcome the former.
I've heard too many martial art instructors go on about how "size makes no difference." Oh, yes, physical attributes (including size) do make a very significant difference - that is the reason why "combat sport" professionals try to get stronger, faster and more powerful.
That whole "with my techniques, even a small woman can beat a 250lb. gorilla" is a marketing gimmick. Serious instructors emphasize techniques AS WELL AS physical attribute development and realistic sparring.
BTW, I trained in Japan and Korea for several years as well. Nothing magical about those places...
Skorzeny
Mike Spight
New member
Some good points here. Anyone familiar with Mr. Rob Redmond's website? It's hilarious and pretty well validates some of the points made in this topic and others.
www.24fightingchickens.com
Redmond is a Shotokan 3d Dan who studied in Japan for two years. I would imagine he's considered to be a real "turd in the punchbowl" by Shotokan poo-bahs here in the US.
Mike
www.24fightingchickens.com
Redmond is a Shotokan 3d Dan who studied in Japan for two years. I would imagine he's considered to be a real "turd in the punchbowl" by Shotokan poo-bahs here in the US.
Mike
On second thought, Skorzeny did sum up exactly what I believe. However, I think it is worth mentioning my motivation behind my statements. Sensop seems to have had his feelings hurt by my statements that one martial art is superior to another. Well, I would love to hold hands with all martial artists and sing "We are the world". But, I keep coming back to the fact that martial arts need to primarily work on the street. All the spirtual development mumbo jumbo is a distant second. It is only logical that some arts are more realistic and effective than others. I remember Chuck Taylor stating in a class, "What you believe can get you killed". The $64,000 question is - what are you going to believe about fighting and the selection of the right training methods for fighting. This deserves to be debated and discussed. And, I do not apologize for hurting anyones feelings. If I convince them of their martial art's limitations, I have done them a big favor. We are big boys now. We can take the criticism.
Is Judo the perfect martial art? Hardley. I do know that if two fighters have roughly the same striking ability, if one of the fighters wants the struggle to go to the ground - it will. The person getting hit the most usually makes this decision. I spent 10 years in Shotokan and got my Shodan black belt. I liked Karate. But, I have never met a more brainwashed group. My first day in a Brazilian Jiu Jitsu class, I was taken down a dozen times by blue belts. My Karate could not stop them. So, in a sense, my Karate sensei did me a diservice by not training realistically. The real person to blame was me. I believed him. I should have known better. My Karate was worthless on the ground. All my Karate instructor could say was that it shouldn't have gone to the ground. That was the dumbest thing I had ever heard. It did. I did repeatedly.
Dave
Is Judo the perfect martial art? Hardley. I do know that if two fighters have roughly the same striking ability, if one of the fighters wants the struggle to go to the ground - it will. The person getting hit the most usually makes this decision. I spent 10 years in Shotokan and got my Shodan black belt. I liked Karate. But, I have never met a more brainwashed group. My first day in a Brazilian Jiu Jitsu class, I was taken down a dozen times by blue belts. My Karate could not stop them. So, in a sense, my Karate sensei did me a diservice by not training realistically. The real person to blame was me. I believed him. I should have known better. My Karate was worthless on the ground. All my Karate instructor could say was that it shouldn't have gone to the ground. That was the dumbest thing I had ever heard. It did. I did repeatedly.
Dave
Danger Dave
New member
Absolutely size (or at least strength) makes a difference. If it didn't, there wouldn't be weight divisions in all combative sports. By leveling the size playing field, the contest becomes more about skill/preparation than physical advantages.
Fighting, I think, is largely about advantages - exploiting yours, while preventing him from exploiting his. Superior skill is an advantage. Size/Strength is an advantage. Ditto for speed, endurance, numbers, tolerance for pain, a good old fashioned mean streak (vastly underrated, IMHO), weaponry, etc., etc - there are too many to be counted here.
If you can force your advantages on your opponent while preventing him from doing the same to you, you win. If not, you don't.
Fighting, I think, is largely about advantages - exploiting yours, while preventing him from exploiting his. Superior skill is an advantage. Size/Strength is an advantage. Ditto for speed, endurance, numbers, tolerance for pain, a good old fashioned mean streak (vastly underrated, IMHO), weaponry, etc., etc - there are too many to be counted here.
If you can force your advantages on your opponent while preventing him from doing the same to you, you win. If not, you don't.
Size does matter. I will not dispute that.
I have, however, often trained with much larger (not hard, at less than 150 lbs) partners. Often these partners were over 7" taller, and considerably heavier.
Many of these larger folks had horrible skills. They relied on their size and strength instead of learning something new- finesse, balance, controlled speed. I could often see their disdain at training with a hobbit.
I often had to work hard not to hurt them- in fact- whatever their rank- if I knew they didn't want to train with me (in the last 3 years), they have uniformly been terrible training partners.
I had found that these same individuals usually carry more tension than smaller, more skilled people. That means that I get more return for every strike I put into them. Having a much higher center of gravity, it is also invariably much easier to get them off balance.
"Larger targets."
I have, however, often trained with much larger (not hard, at less than 150 lbs) partners. Often these partners were over 7" taller, and considerably heavier.
Many of these larger folks had horrible skills. They relied on their size and strength instead of learning something new- finesse, balance, controlled speed. I could often see their disdain at training with a hobbit.
I often had to work hard not to hurt them- in fact- whatever their rank- if I knew they didn't want to train with me (in the last 3 years), they have uniformly been terrible training partners.
I had found that these same individuals usually carry more tension than smaller, more skilled people. That means that I get more return for every strike I put into them. Having a much higher center of gravity, it is also invariably much easier to get them off balance.
"Larger targets."
Problem is that most people treat martial arts as a form of competition and exercise instead of what it was originally designed, a means to defend ones life with the use of no weapons.
The reason most martial artists cannot fight at all is because they are not trained to fight, they are trained to compete in tournament or they are not forced to take the art to which they practice seriously.
The majority of the schools of martial arts in order to stay in business must cater to the highest denominator in order to keep revenue flowing. This is after all a business in this country, so the dojos "market" their styles as exercise, ways to develop self confidence, and the list goes on ad infinitum(just look in the yellow pages for more examples).
I could continue on but then this would become a diatribe of my own beliefs and convictions, and I'm sure none of you have that kind of time.
But beyond being serious, the video was quite humorous
The reason most martial artists cannot fight at all is because they are not trained to fight, they are trained to compete in tournament or they are not forced to take the art to which they practice seriously.
The majority of the schools of martial arts in order to stay in business must cater to the highest denominator in order to keep revenue flowing. This is after all a business in this country, so the dojos "market" their styles as exercise, ways to develop self confidence, and the list goes on ad infinitum(just look in the yellow pages for more examples).
I could continue on but then this would become a diatribe of my own beliefs and convictions, and I'm sure none of you have that kind of time.
But beyond being serious, the video was quite humorous
Gryphon,
I don't think these guys made that mistake- rather, they assumed that (1) they wouldn't get anything from training with a little guy, and (2) little guys are no threat.
Usually they changed their mind after I started hitting their kyusho, unless they determined that it was because they were being "nice" to me.
(I couldn't hit ANY of these guys as hard as I usually strike in training with good ukes, without them whining.)
I don't think these guys made that mistake- rather, they assumed that (1) they wouldn't get anything from training with a little guy, and (2) little guys are no threat.
Usually they changed their mind after I started hitting their kyusho, unless they determined that it was because they were being "nice" to me.
(I couldn't hit ANY of these guys as hard as I usually strike in training with good ukes, without them whining.)Size
You do not seem to understand that yes,in combat sports,size des matter and that there are weight divisions.But this is only because these fights are in a controlled atmosphere,with a soft surface,a ring,and many many rules.It is not the real thng and of course size will make a difference there.
But there are no rules in a street fight and it comes down to who is the better fighter,not the size of his biceps.
Mind you,there are martial arts out there that do favour big,physically strong people,but they are useless.If an art relies upon brute strength and extra aggression,listen to my advice...forget it!
Because if you are injured,tired,sick or confused,you are in trouble.
You do not seem to understand that yes,in combat sports,size des matter and that there are weight divisions.But this is only because these fights are in a controlled atmosphere,with a soft surface,a ring,and many many rules.It is not the real thng and of course size will make a difference there.
But there are no rules in a street fight and it comes down to who is the better fighter,not the size of his biceps.
Mind you,there are martial arts out there that do favour big,physically strong people,but they are useless.If an art relies upon brute strength and extra aggression,listen to my advice...forget it!
Because if you are injured,tired,sick or confused,you are in trouble.
Witzig:
If you are from the Tanaka Clan, then show us the Dim-Mak, the Death Touch!
Who needs physical attributes when you can damage internal organs of your opponent with your death massage!
In all seriousness, size and strength are but two of many physical attributes. Others included speed, endurance and tolerance for pain (more neurological and mental than physical, I suppose).
They ALL make a difference (to varying extents) as disparity in skill levels and efficacy of particular techniques do.
To say that physical attributes make no difference in a fight is as ignorant and unrealistic as to say that skills make no difference.
What exactly is your training in "martial" arts?
Skorzeny
If you are from the Tanaka Clan, then show us the Dim-Mak, the Death Touch!
Who needs physical attributes when you can damage internal organs of your opponent with your death massage!
In all seriousness, size and strength are but two of many physical attributes. Others included speed, endurance and tolerance for pain (more neurological and mental than physical, I suppose).
They ALL make a difference (to varying extents) as disparity in skill levels and efficacy of particular techniques do.
To say that physical attributes make no difference in a fight is as ignorant and unrealistic as to say that skills make no difference.
What exactly is your training in "martial" arts?
Skorzeny
Danger Dave
New member
So, in an open, no rules fight, a 250lb man has no advantage over a 90lb woman?
PLEASE!
Yes, it's possible for the smaller person to win. There are many other factors besides size that come into play in a fight. BUT size IS a factor.
Think of it this way: Which would you rather fight - a highly skilled, mean as heck fella who's your size, or an equally trained & mean fella who's got an extra 75 lbs of muscle?
Thought so.
PS - I haven't seen a martial art yet that nuetralized size - some are better at it than others, but an advantage is an advantage.
PLEASE!
Yes, it's possible for the smaller person to win. There are many other factors besides size that come into play in a fight. BUT size IS a factor.
Think of it this way: Which would you rather fight - a highly skilled, mean as heck fella who's your size, or an equally trained & mean fella who's got an extra 75 lbs of muscle?
Thought so.
PS - I haven't seen a martial art yet that nuetralized size - some are better at it than others, but an advantage is an advantage.
- Status