And being asked how secure they are?
I understand it's none of doctors' business; plus, they most likely know less about firearms safety than we do. But... when a parent whose child is about to do sleep over or just do a play date at my house asks me about guns (or how securely they are stored), I would NEVER be offended.
Reason 1: You betcha, I'm going to ask that same question myself (and inquire about safety more generally) when my child visits someone else's home for a playdate. Even, if its my brother's or father's home.
Reason 2: It is an opportunity for us, gun owners, to showcase how responsible and paranoid about safety we are. Kinda like a PR move that only benefits the image of the gun-owning community.
Why does Brady campaign and Moms-demand-action "own" this issue (i.e., widely perceived to be winning on this issue)? Shouldn't we try to wrestle it away from them by fully embracing it ourselves, and in the process showing anti's a middle finger while also winning some undecided folks over to our side?
I understand it's none of doctors' business; plus, they most likely know less about firearms safety than we do. But... when a parent whose child is about to do sleep over or just do a play date at my house asks me about guns (or how securely they are stored), I would NEVER be offended.
Reason 1: You betcha, I'm going to ask that same question myself (and inquire about safety more generally) when my child visits someone else's home for a playdate. Even, if its my brother's or father's home.
Reason 2: It is an opportunity for us, gun owners, to showcase how responsible and paranoid about safety we are. Kinda like a PR move that only benefits the image of the gun-owning community.
Why does Brady campaign and Moms-demand-action "own" this issue (i.e., widely perceived to be winning on this issue)? Shouldn't we try to wrestle it away from them by fully embracing it ourselves, and in the process showing anti's a middle finger while also winning some undecided folks over to our side?
Last edited: