Who is MMM's Donna Dees-Thomases Really?

[JimDiver]

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/ed-column-2000510173326.htm

"The New York Times, whose motto is "all the news that's fit to print," does manage to squeeze into this almost 2000-word report the background fact that Ms. Dees-Thomases is "currently on leave from her job as a part- time publicist for CBS." So, apparently, she is not just any New Jersey mother, but a part-time CBS publicist. But even the vaunted New York Times couldn't fit in all the news about Ms. Dees-Thomases. Before she was a part-time publicist, she was Dan Rather himself's publicist and by reputation an exceptionally able public relations executive.

Oh, there is one other interesting fact about her. If the last half of her hyphenated name rings a bell, it's no accident. She just happens to be the sister-in-law of Susan Thomases, who just happens to be Hillary Clinton's best friend and closest political adviser. Just a New Jersey housewife, indeed. One might as well identify Queen Elizabeth as "Liz Windsor, an English mother of four."


Well, Well, Well... So, MMM is a grass roots thing eh?? BULLSH!T!!

 

[sumabich]

Since you've opened the can. Here are some questions maybe some of our enlightened members maybe able to answer. 1. How is the MMM organized? Is is a non-profit? If so what state is it organized in? If it has operated long enough any person can walk into thier establishment (or write) and ask for a federal 990 report. This could give clues as to where the money is comming from. If as some of you are saying (and I am fairly convinced there is way too many coincecences) this is an extension of the Clintons we need to find the evidence!

 

[tl]

Another vintage Clintonism. Everything either of the two of them touch is done for one, and only one purpose; to help themselves, either to divert attention from a legal or ethical problem, or to try and establish some sort of positive legacy. I can't believe this wasn't obvious to me earlier. Look at the 'celebrities' involved and their political agenda. This is a rhetorical question, but is there anything the Clinton's do that doesn't have a hidden agenda?

------------------
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." Albert Einstein

 

[Slowpoke_Rodrigo]

sumabich, the MMM claims 501(c)(3) status, but may be in violation of IRS non-profit regs - see http://www.thefiringline.com:8080/forums/showthread.php?threadid=26711.

[This message has been edited by Slowpoke_Rodrigo (edited May 11, 2000).]

 

[JimDiver]

So, what is the course of action to take to correct this?

How does one get the 501 revoked?