White-Flag-Waving Democrats Are Shameless on Iraq War

Once again, Michael Reagan calls a spade a spade. The clarity and insight he possesses is desperately needed in Congress, but is sadly lacking.

Any American politician who would use the brutalizing and butchering of two brave American soldiers to advance the anti-war, anti-Bush political agenda is unfit for political office.

As Zell Miller said: "I can remember when Democrats believed that it was the duty of America to fight for freedom over tyranny."


White-Flag-Waving Democrats Are Shameless on Iraq War

by Michael Reagan

The Biblical book of Ecclesiastes tells us tells us there's a time for everything, including a "time to love and a time to hate ... a time for war and a time for peace."

There is also a time for rage, and in this time of war that time is now.

The bodies of two courageous U.S. soldiers, Pfc. Kristian Menchaca and Pfc. Thomas Tucker, were found Monday, and, according to CNN reports, "mutilated and booby-trapped." They had been so horribly mutilated with their eyes gouged out and their remains so desecrated a visual identification was impossible -- DNA testing was needed in order to confirm their identities. CNN also reported that not only were the bodies booby-trapped, but homemade bombs also lined the road leading to the victims, an apparent effort to complicate recovery efforts and kill recovery teams.

That story makes my blood boil -- and it should make yours reach boiling point too. More than anything else in the recent events in Iraq, this horrific outrage demonstrates with awful clarity the kind of depraved monsters we are facing in the war on terrorism.

It also shows why they must be eliminated from the face of the earth. They are a species with which civilized mankind cannot co-exist. During the Civil War when Gen. T.J. (Stonewall) Jackson was asked how to deal with the enemy, he had a simple answer: "Kill 'em; kill 'em all."

The hideous torture and killing of Kristian Menchaca and Thomas Tucker should tell us that it’s time to adopt Jackson's strategy as our own. Their deaths are proof that we face an enemy that will never cut and run, but will lurk in the shadows and strike out against us at every opportunity until they have been wiped off the face of the earth. Nothing else can guarantee the safety of the American people.

Incredibly in some quarters, instead of provoking rage -- and a firm and renewed determination to prevail in the war against Islamofascist terrorism no matter how long it takes - this unspeakable outrage has been seized upon as an opportunity to make political capital out of a disaster of mammoth proportions.

The antiwar left in the Democrat Party and the Bush haters in much of the mainstream media have been shameless in their reaction to the deaths of these two brave men.

How many relatives, for example, did NBC News have to canvass before they found a kin of Pfc. Menchaca who would take the occasion of his relative’s murder to express his anti-administration views? NBC’s Today Show found Ken MacKenzie, Menchaca’s uncle, who obligingly told NBC, "Because the U.S. government did not have a plan in place, my nephew has paid for it with his life." He added that the government should have offered a $100 million reward and offered to exchange mujahideen detainees for the soldiers’ lives. It seized enough money from Saddam Hussein to afford it, he said.

He had nothing to say about the brutes who murdered his nephew, and expressed no anger at them.

The Democrats all but jumped for joy over the sleazy opportunity they saw to exploit the soldiers' deaths for their political purposes. Listen to Illinois Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin's comment that the discovery of the two mutilated soldiers' bodies is a "grim reminder of the price we're paying for a failed policy in Iraq."

Like McKenzie, he didn’t bother to direct his anger at the fiends who committed the atrocity.

Nor did he or any of his anti-war Democrat colleagues bother to note that the so-called “failed policy” in Iraq has produced 5 million Iraqi children inoculated since the U.S went into Iraq, or how many schools and hospitals have been built, the 32,000 teachers trained, that 20 million Iraqis now have clean water -- all the positive things they or the media studiously ignore.

Now instead of the rage they should feel, these white-flag-waving Democrats are demanding that the U.S. set some sort of timetable for withdrawal, ignoring the fact that such an act would be a signal to the al Qaeda butchers to be patient and hang in there and wait for the U.S. to cut and run.

Have they no shame?
Obviously not.
 
It also shows why they must be eliminated from the face of the earth. They are a species with which civilized mankind cannot co-exist. During the Civil War when Gen. T.J. (Stonewall) Jackson was asked how to deal with the enemy, he had a simple answer: "Kill 'em; kill 'em all."

Welp, my dad liked Michael Reagan ten years ago and it's a shame I'm not going to continue the tradition as of now.
 
That's what war is about: Find, close with, and kill the enemy. While we're at it, let's remember who started this war.

If 2985 dead American citizens isn't a good enough reason to "kill 'em all," this nation will not long survive.
 
As Zell Miller said: "I can remember when Democrats believed that it was the duty of America to fight for freedom over tyranny."

Yeah, you know what, I remember when the GOP (said they) believed that too.

Find, close with, and kill the enemy. While we're at it, let's remember who started this war.

The Iraqi people didn't start the war. A bunch of pissed-off Saudis were responsible for 9/11, and Duhbya started the actual "war" part of the war. So why aren't we attacking Saudia Arabia?
 
Fine. If we accept that the SAUDI hijackers started the actual war, then why are we attacking a third party which wasn't involved?
 
If 2985 dead American citizens isn't a good enough reason to "kill 'em all," this nation will not long survive.
A nation that holds that kind of attitude does not deserve to survive. Thankfully most Americans are a bit more enlightened than those who would commit genocide due to a fraction of extremists.
 
Uhh...'cuz they sell us so much oil? 'Cuz they're good friends with our president's family? Because they buy a lot of military hardware from us?

No, I'm just being snarky. The real reason is because the Saudi government didn't have anything to do with 9/11 and they're doing everything they can to help us win the war on terror and they're the closest thing we have to friends in the region.
The question isn't 'why didn't we attack Saudi Arabia', the question is 'why *did* we attack Iraq.
 
Take off the blinders, folk! Look around!

Because Saddam is a bad bad man what has them nasty Dubbya Em Dees!
Uuuuuh... From brother Antipas, on another thread at this very forum...
Breaking News: WMD's Found

Santorum: We Found the WMD - Think Progress Blog

Santorum: Military has found 500 chemical munitions shells in Iraq (Video added) - Hot Air Blog

Document Details WMD Recovered In Iraq, Santorum Says - Townhall.com

GOP, Democrats maneuver for advantage in Iraq debate - Boston Globe

No links from CNN.com or Foxnews.com, although the broadcast news on Fox and the O'Reilly Factor reported this.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Santorum
"The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction is in fact false," Santorum said. "We have found over 500 weapons of mass destruction and in fact have found that there are additional chemical weapons still in the country."

So, 500+ canisters/projectiles (from the shots shown, they look like 250 gallon sealed/presurized tanks) of Mustard and/or Sarin gas have been found, according to some declassified documents from the DOD, and read to congress a few minutes ago.

I have some questions on this... Mainly, given the stink over WMD's, why in the world was this ever classified to begin with? Why haven't the PTB reported these finds as they have occured?

Or is this just more lies being spread by :eek: "The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy?" :eek:
 
Bush has been going after terrorists that had close ties with the guys who flew the planes. He went to Afghanistan first and then had to deal with Saddam in Iraq because Saddam had close ties with Islamic extreme terrorism.

And, if the President of Iran keeps up his blabbering and boasting, and then acts on it, you better believe we're going down his throat too. And if N. Korea does something stupid, we will retaliate because not only is S. Korea an allie, but we have troops there.

Terrorism is the enemy here. We are at war with anyone who is linked to international terrorism, and specifically targeting us and our allies.

Doesn't matter how loud the media cries about it or how they spin it, destroying the terrorists is what is has been about since the beginning.
 
One man's terrorism is another man's freedom fighting. It's one thing to protect the world from truly bad people but the term terrorist can be stretched pretty wide if care isn't taken. In twenty or thirty years time terrorists may be those damned redneck neanderthals that refuse to turn over their evil guns, ancient religion and 85% of their paychecks.
 
After the surrender of the Japanese on September 2, 1945, why did we stay to rebuild the country? And why did we expose our troops to attacks from hold-outs from the former Japanese forces?

Why have we continued to maintain a military presence in the region even until today?

Why, after years of fierce combat resulting in the May 7, 1945 surrender of Germany did we stay to rebuild the country? And why did we expose our troops to attacks from hold-outs from the old Nazi regime?

And why, until only recently, did we maintain a rather large troop presence in Western Europe, as well as keeping tactical nukes in the picture?

Why, after 53 years since the "end" of the Korean War, do we still have troops there?

And why, 23 years after the invasion of Grenada, do we not have any troops stationed there?

Connect the dots. Here's some: ... ... ... .. ... ... .. . . . .. .. ..
 
That's funny. I think we are there because they are now our friends and we want to protect our friends. We also have assets there too and we want to protect them.
 
Back
Top