Which is best ... IWB Kydex?

[EOD Guy in VA]

I need some advice.
I'm looking at the Blade-Tech U.C.H. http://shop.blade-tech.com/merchant.ihtml?id=14&step=2
and Comp-Tac Shirt Tucker http://www.comp-tac.com/
Both seem to have advantages.
Anyone have experience with either of these?

 

[waltherpfive]

I have never owned a holster from Blade-Tech but I do have 2 from Comp-Tac, both the shirt tucker and the undercover. For the money I don't think they can be beat. JMHO

 

[AK103K]

I have a number of Blade-Tec holsters, a couple of IWB and a couple of belt holsters. They make good stuff. I like the snaps better than the hooks for the IWB, they are more secure for my lifestyle. I havent tried the UCH model though. I've used one IWB every day for over 5+ years now and it still looks like new, only had to replace a couple of straps, they are about the only thing that can wear. When it gets loaded with lint, just run a dry rag through it a couple of times and its ready to go. Very little maintenance.

 

[KPS]

I prefer a thinner kydex holster for IWB.Something molded a bit more to my weapon.You might want to look into FIST holsters www.fist-inc.com and Ky-Tac holsters http://hometown.aol.com/KYTAC/ before making a decision.

 

[EOD Guy in VA]

Thanks for the input.

I've decided to to with the Blade-Tech UHC for my P239, and the
Comp-tac Shirt Tucker for my heavier P229 since it has over the belt clips that will better support the weight.