which has more penetration

"...which has more penetration..." On what? Cast bullets aren't made for penetration. If either hits anything remotely hard, like a bone, it'll expand.
 
"...which will go deeper..." Hi. Doesn't matter. A hit with either will do for SD. Not so much for hunting. Cast bullets just aren't made for penetration.
 
I vote for the 200 grain. It will out penetrate the other load mentioned with the medium that it passes thru being equal.
 
Momentum beats energy for penetration, so the 200 should win.

For some reason, I thought there was a difference between "cast" and "hard cast". IE aren't HC designed to penetrate better?
 
Cast bullets just aren't made for penetration.

Respectfully, I disagree. A properly cast bullet, of the correct alloy will penetrate just fine through tissue. That's what they're designed to do.

However, in this particular question, the difference between 180 and 200 will be the difference between eenie and meenie and may rest on such things as bullet design, powder choices, other variables.
 
"on paper" - the 200.
It has a higher sectional density.

In real life, either is going to penetrate the same or more or less.

A shot to shot variance of around 10% in velocity isn't really out of the range of normal.

Some guns may shoot the heavier 200 as fast or faster than another gun would shoot the lighter 180.

A hit with either will do for SD. Not so much for hunting. Cast bullets just aren't made for penetration
Elmer Keith would disagree w/that & also have a whole pile of taken game to back up his side of the discussion...
 
"Cast bullets aren't made for penetration. If either hits anything remotely hard, like a bone, it'll expand." A hard cast bullet like an LBT will not expand. You should do some research before making inacurate comments. The Linebaugh Seminars use the famous "Bone Box" for testing and that is a large bone backed up by wet newspaper and the hard cast "big bore" LBTs go 4 feet after blowing up the bone. Here are some results from the "Bone Box" from Handloads.com "Linebaugh Seminar Penetration Tests" http://www.handloads.com/misc/linebaugh.penetration.tests.asp
 
In a non-expanding/non-deforming projectile, momentum is a good indicator of penetration.

If you have two projectiles that won't expand or deform and that have the same frontal area the one with more momentum will penetrate deeper if they both hit the identical target media.
Cast bullets aren't made for penetration.
On the contrary, hard cast bullets are typically used to maximize penetration in relatively low power chamberings such as handguns or low velocity rifle chamberings.
 
"...which has more penetration..." On what? Cast bullets aren't made for penetration. If either hits anything remotely hard, like a bone, it'll expand.

Another blanket statment that never should of seen the light of day. Lead and lead alloys are not created equal. Hardcast in general does not expand much if at all while 100% lead is very soft. Like John said, many cast shooters and reloaders including Elmer Keith use/used cast lead alloy bullets on the hard side to take all sorts of game from handguns to get better pentration and bone busting ability. Many shooters today still swear by a good hardcast with a large meplat for hunting big game with a revolver.

LK
 
which has more penetration

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

180 grain hardcast .357 @ 1425 fps

200 grain hardcast .357 @ 1305 fps

???

Curious as to why does it or would it matter?:confused:
 
The only load data I could find with a 180 @ 1400 was with a 10" barrel in an Encore. Pressure was 39,000, 4000 over SAAMI max. In the normal 4" barrel, you're looking at 1150. If your intended targets are two legged, the 125jhp@ 1450 is the standard. If four legged, a 158 JSP will easily penetrate a 150# deer @ 50 yards. If you want a 200, shoot a .41Mag.
 
Curious as to why does it or would it matter?

Yep, me too. I picked 200 over 180, but for no real reason, mainly to see if they weren't to long for my cylinders. Some cylinders are too short for 200s, at least that's what I heard anyways. It's not tru in my case, but it's close.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top