Therapydude
New member
I'm really confused as to which handgun I should choose for concealed carry. I've narrowed down the competition to either the Glock 19 or the Sig 229. I like .40 S&W, and was ready to get a Glock 23, but started seeing a lot of traffic on the web about the KB! factor in Glock's larger caliber handguns. Since I reload, I figure that the Glock .40 could be a potentially dangerous choice (at least without a barrel upgrade). I've read that the Glock 9mm pistols don't tend to have this problem (I guess because the 9mm doesn't build up as much pressure in the partially unsupported chamber) and that they are the superior choice in caliber for a Glock. A friend of mine has a Sig 226 in .40 and likes it a lot. I admit that Sig pistols are pretty awesome, but my only reservation is that the blued finish won't stand up to extended holster wear, whereas the Glock's combination of polymer and tenifer coating would stand up to more abuse. If I buy the P229, I'll probably keep it stock (might change the grips, though). However, if I buy the glock I'll probably install a bar-sto barrel, Novak sights, and replace the guide rod and spring, plus I might try to scrounge up a pre-ban mag or two. I know that this has been pretty long-winded, but if any of you can provide me with your own personal experiences, I would be grateful. Thanks!