Which .357 Magnum, 4", 7-shot (or 6-shot) revolver to get as a carry weapon?

Para Bellum

New member
Title says all. I am looking for a .357 Magnum revolver with a 4" Barrel and at least 6-shots, better 7. Weight is an issue. Reliability is crucial. There is a real specific threat and I do carry 24/7...

as of now I consider a S&W 520 or Ruger GP-141 or even S&W 329PD in .44 Mag?


Thanks for your advice.
 
163687_large.jpg


Not exactly what you specified but it is a heck of a carry weapon. The S&W 7-shot, 357/38, TiScan 386 is light, reliable, accurate, and IMHO one heck of a carry weapon. I have been carrying mine for about 2 years and it is hard to beat.
 
This S&W Model 65 is a 6-shot, 4" barrel .357 revolver of proven design. It has an integral rear sight, which is better suited for carry. At 35oz, It's as light as you'll get in S&W 4" without going to the light alloy models, which might be lighter than you like if you need to shoot it, as well as carry it. :D

162604_large.jpg


I think any S&W revolver is going to be very reliable. They are very well made, and there is just a lot less to go wrong with a revolver than a semiauto.
 
If you can find one, I highly suggest a Colt King Cobra. Preferably in Stainless. Great shooters out of the box.
 
Ruger GP 100

S&W 686+

My preference is for the Ruger. Are you sure you want to carry a 4" barrel? The 3" barrel would be a tad easier to lug around...
 
get the ruger you will not regret it ,they are nice,i have owned 4 of them and am going to purchase another one soon.very reliable gun and in my opinion the number one defense gun in a revolver period.
 
Gotta get the Taurus 627

4" barrel, 7 shots, 8 3/4" long and only weighs 28.4 oz. Got mine in Stainless. I really don't think you could go wrong. They also offer the same gun in titanium which weighs 4 oz less, but costs about $100 more. I replaced the factory grip with a Hogue and really like the feel. Trigger is somewhat light, which could be adjusted.
 
Years ago I faced the same dilemma. I bought a four inch L frame.
Had I to do it all over a again, I would have bought a 3 inch K frame instead as it is lighter and better balanced and a lot more portable.
If you can find one get your mits on a 3 inch model 66 or 65. You will thank me later. The L's are about as well balanced and light as a brick with a handle on it.
 


I like the Taraus Tracker I have and the SW 66. Then, theres the GP-100 and the Colt service revolvers. (Or a Dan Wesson...)

It comes down to what fits your hand and your budget. I don't think any of the reputable revolver makers have "bad" choices.



-tINY

 
Bahhhh! Forget all these modern flashy stainless revolvers! For CCW? .357 4 inch? Getchu a nyyyyyyce blue finished model 19 with wooden grips! :cool:

Or a intimidating mucle bound Model 28 or 27 4 inch! :eek: Thatul mess somebody up...or makum run away before you gotta messumup ;)
 
If you are entirely confident that a 4" 686+ will not be too big nor too heavy for your uses (I feel they are too much for my concealed carry needs!) then by all means buy a 4" 686+ without the built-in lock. They are simply superb weapons!!! Here's one with 3" barrel:

686-4_LF6081.jpg


Much more readily available than the 3" is the version with a 2.5" barrel... an excellent choice as well, and you don't give up much at all in power with a 2.5" .357.

M686_1162LF.jpg


BUT, if you feel as I do that they are just a bit too much in the size and weight department, consider a Ruger GP-100 with fixed sights and 3" barrel. These are a tad smaller than the 686, sort of between the K-frame and the L-frame. And though you only have six rounds instead of seven, they are fairly readily available, have no internal lock, are highly reliable, durable, and not difficult to pack... though they're still not exactly light nor small! Here's my 3" stainless GP-100:

KGPF331_L.jpg


Down from there? Find a pre-lock model 13 or 65 with 3" barrel. just a little smaller and a touch lighter than the 3" GP-100. Not quite as durable for extended magnum shooting, but still an excellent choice! Just not so easy to find anymore!

M13_L0805.jpg


Down from there? Hands down winner... the 640-1!

640_LF2677.jpg


ALL THAT SAID.... I would feel entirely comfortable carrying a Browning Hi-Power in forty caliber with ten in the mag and one in the tube. 11 rounds of potent defense power in one of the most comfortable, excellent handling, and reliable semi-auto pistols the world has ever known. I have two, a polished blue Standard forty and a silver chrome forty. They feed on and digest ammo with amazing reliability. Along with the 1911, they're one of the two finest semi-autos available. Generally speaking, I've found the Hi-Power to be even more reliable than the typical 1911. They do need a professional trigger job, however, to get a really nice trigger feel.
 
Speed loader for 7 round S&W

I am a believer that a sixgun should be just that. I don't know if speedloaders are available for 7 or more round guns. To be truthful I've never bothered to find out either. If speedloaders aren't available I couldn't imagine why anyone would ever bother with a 7 round cylinder.
It makes no kind of sense to me at all.
 
Five is OK, six is fine, seven is dandy, eight is great. I don't understand why anyone would prefer fewer rounds to more rounds. In a defense scenario, having just one more round may make all the difference. But certainly, to each his own preferences.
 
Speedloaders are available for "seven Shooters"...

Not quite as fast as safariland but the HKS 587 speedloaders,
are plenty fast, with practice, and offer a rock solid hold on
your rounds. With the HKS loaders don't try to spin the nob,
just hold the nob and rotate the cylinder, it's faster, more secure,
and easier to do under pressure. Old police sgt taught me that trick. :D



Also having an additional round on tap, might make the diff. between
life and death, if you don't have time to reload.
 
Back
Top