We're not talking about an 1880's SAA, that's a whole nuther animal altogether. Along with 2nd generation guns. We're talking about a 3rd generation SAA in a common configuration and a common chambering. Earlier 3rd generation guns do not have their own appeal and there is no reason to pay as much for an older one as it costs to buy a new one. The new ones are better. This is where all those people who bought 3rd generation SAA's to stash away find out that what they thought was a wise investment really wasn't. The only 3rd generation guns that might have something over a new sixgun would be all those commemoratives they made through the `70's. Because they're fancier than average guns, were made in some interesting configurations but still do not go for much more than their plain counterparts.because 99% of people dont want a new colt SAA. an 1880's saa is not as good as a new one either. But I highly doubt you'll see people overlooking a 1st gen cause its not as good as a new one.
because 99% of people dont want a new colt SAA. an 1880's saa is not as good as a new one either. But I highly doubt you'll see people overlooking a 1st gen cause its not as good as a new one.
...anyone would be a fool to pay new prices for a 1979 sample...
Me too.... But I wouldn't pay $1000+ 'just' to have a Colt. Probably why most of my 'collection' is Ruger SAs .... Nor pay no more than $300 for a Python...I never thought I'd say this but I'm part of the 1%!