about having the PD's selling/trading in their guns?
So what if Buford had a gun that had been owned by the Seattle PD?
I don't get it. If that gun went through legitimate channels (except the one where Buford got it) how does that implicate the Seattle PD?
How would destroying the used gun have made a difference?
It all sounds like posturing and mis-placed responsibility to me.
------------------
John/az
"The middle of the road between the extremes of good and evil, is evil. When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!
http://www.countdown9199.com
So what if Buford had a gun that had been owned by the Seattle PD?
I don't get it. If that gun went through legitimate channels (except the one where Buford got it) how does that implicate the Seattle PD?
How would destroying the used gun have made a difference?
It all sounds like posturing and mis-placed responsibility to me.
------------------
John/az
"The middle of the road between the extremes of good and evil, is evil. When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!
http://www.countdown9199.com