What was JFK going to tell us? Part 2

Paul Revere

New member
Either the Moderators or the problems yesterday on-line evaporated my last couple of posts. Since there were some unanswered questions directed at me, I'll try to recompile them here.

Regarding Kennedy's quote: I've read that quote from Kennedy's Columbia University speech in two or three different texts. I wasn't at the University the day that he spoke with a tape recorder or a court stenographer. I can only verify that it's been written into other researchers texts over the years, and thought it worthy of discussion in this forum. None of us knew what Kennedy was about to tell us, HE'S DEAD! Those involved with his assassination want the stories surrounding his death to be dead as well. We can only draw conclusions from the evidence of what he was doing while in office, and the people/organizations upon which those acts effected.

The last place I read Kennedy's quote was in a book by David Icke, called "and the Truth Shall Set you Free". I acknowledged that David Icke has been labeled everything from a nut case to an anti-Semite. Isn't it interesting how this tends to happen as researchers get close to publicly exposing the truth? I don't know Mr. Icke, but I believe he has done his homework. He unfortunately mixes his researched results with his own personal twist about the "powers" that control all of us (which I do NOT agree with 100%). However, he has compiled an excellent source of information on the World events that have led us to our present day, and how just a very small number of people are connected to all of those events. In my definition (and Webster's), that is a "CONSPIRACY", and I recommend that even the biggest skeptics should read David Icke's book.

By the way, George H.W. Bush was/is a part of this conspiracy, but certainly not one of the puppeteers. During Vietnam (the war that disguised a massive drug running operation), Bush was apparently the U.S. Ambassador to China (or something of similar capacity). The heroin that was being shipped back into the U.S. via body bags from Vietnam, originated in China. All of Bush's organizational connections, inter link him directly with the puppeteers (the main conspirators).

Additionally, "interest free money" is simply a term to describe currency that was backed by something tangible, and wasn't loaned to us by the Fed with interest (like it is today).

Back to David Icke: One of the events that he discusses in his book, "and the Truth Shall Set you Free", is how Adolph Hitler was funded/armed by American and British bankers (most of whom were Jewish). Now many of us would immediately disagree with the idea that America, for the most part, funded and armed the Nazi regime of Hitler. But, I've read this in more than 6 different texts. In addition, I verified this story by asking Aaron Zelman of the JPFO (our respected pro-gun/Jewish activist). He not only confirmed this account, but he added 3 more texts on the subject for my additional verification.

Most of us do not believe in conspiracies, and rightfully so...they seem so unbelievable. To conceptualize that we've been lied to by our parents, our teachers, the media, and our politicians about what's really going on is just unimaginable. We expect more, and we deserve more. But much of this lying is done innocently, even unintentionally. Most of those involved with this conspiracy (to create a "Global Fascist Tyranny"), don't even know they're involved. To fathom the idea that our history books have been rewritten (to perpetuate the necessity of a centralized government), that our teachers unknowingly teach us these things in which they themselves were taught, and our parents/friends are all products of this same indoctrination (propaganda turned into education), makes one's head spin with certain disbelief.

If we turn on the nightly news, or pick up the daily newspaper, or tune into the radio station on the way to work, we would never guess that a constant message is being broadcast, which ultimately results in a sort of indoctrination (creating a consensus of opinion). Nor would we believe who owns all of these major media conglomerates, or how they are interconnected with the bigger picture of what is definitely a conspiracy. Or how all the official lines fed to us are a part of this fraud.

Until we begin to completely think for ourselves, question every official line, investigate every other plausible answer, and then draw our own conclusions, we simply become marching sheeple. It is extremely unpleasant to discuss the idea of conspiracy without fearing being labeled as a "nut case", "right-wing extremist", or worse "an anti-government zealot". But we cannot fear the truth, especially if the truth lays just beyond the lies, the name calling, and the skepticism, we must demand it, seek it, and investigate it.

I've personally found no "politically correct" sources of information on this conspiracy...NONE. You won't either. You just have to read as much as you can covering many different views, and conclusions, and evidence, and decide for yourself what you want to believe. I assure you however, that as much as the conspirators try to keep their agenda secret, it is extremely difficult to hide everything, or to keep intelligent investigators from drawing educated conclusions.

The results will allow you to see past the Sarah Bradys and Chuck Schumers and Bill Clintons of this world. You'll see more clearly how the candidates for president are chosen for us, not elected. How, no matter which of the two parties becomes president, they ultimately deliver the same results. Results that are evaporating our American freedom, minute by minute.

And lastly, you will learn what can be done to reverse this trend towards an ultimate Global tyranny. It has nothing to do with calling, writing, or voting your politicians into or out of positions/office. It has nothing to do with fighting another civil war against UN troops or black helicopters.

It has everything to do with learning the truth behind the fraud of this conspiracy, and then sharing that information with others. Exposing the fraud, so that people can think for themselves, breaking away from the indoctrination process of the media, and our educational system. Without a consensus of the people to accept a centralized government, the conspirators stand no chance to rule us, or to complete the process of civilian disarmament, or to take our freedom away.

Who am I to care what you all believe anyway? Well, I'm just a guy who happens to cherish my freedom to do whatever I want, to say anything I want, and to own whatever I want without some government bureaucracy dictating me. I'm a guy who understands that a single voice crying into the wind will not reverse this current trend toward tyranny. For that, it becomes a numbers game.

There's no horse for me to ride across the countryside yelling my warning of what's coming, but there are people like you who can help change this course by taking action from my written words, or those of others who seek freedom. By ignoring the warning, you'll never know what you could have had, until it's too late.

Paul Revere
 
I didn't post this in the other thread because the post that brought up David Icke had been deleted by the computer dimwits that serviced TFL's server. The moderators did not delete any posts.

All: Check out David Icke here and decide on his credibility for yourself.
 
An excellent place to begin is at the John Birch Society's website. The link provided will get you access to their "Subject Index".
http://www.thenewamerican.com/focus/

In addition, this is a must read:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0912986212/qid=954959345/sr=1-1/002-5162226-3509049

Unlike Icke's website, you won't find anything about "Robot Radicals" (left wing conspirators), or "Reptilians" (Elitist breedstock). It's amazing how manufactured labels can divert our attention from what may actually be behind them.
 
"The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, the British royal family, and the ruling political and economic families of the US and the rest of the world come from these SAME bloodlines.

This is why the so called Eastern Establishment families of the United States interbreed with each other as obsessively as the European royal and "noble" families have always done. And similar families across the world. It is not because of snobbery, it is to hold as best they can a genetic structure - the reptilian-mammalian DNA combination which allows them to "shape-shift"."


I now have ruined another keyboard by spilling mountain dew, which was probably conceived by the CIA as a way of sterilizing the "radicals" whom their advertisements focus on.

One day someone's going to peek at the monitor in my cube and wonder...

Paul, if this huge global conspiracy exists, why are you still alive? If they can whack JFK in broad daylight, what's keeping them from tracking down some guy on the internet and letting him have an accident?
 
TomMarker...

An easy deduction by the tone of your post that you aren't buying the "Global Conspiracy" deal. I certainly don't blame you my friend. It's a stretch for anyone to believe.

Check this out: http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1996/vo12no19/vo12no19_proof.htm

Your comment; "Paul, if this huge global conspiracy exists, why are you still alive? If they can whack JFK in broad daylight, what's keeping them from tracking down some guy on the internet and letting him have an accident?"

In reference to JFK, check out this source: http://www.ratical.com/ratville/JFK/GoD.html

Tom, that would be a huge undertaking to track down (and "whack") everyone who discusses the conspiracy on-line (which is becoming a huge number of people and organizations), and what would that accomplish? The majority of the people in the United States are satisfied with, and have trust in the "system" for their information. That's all the conspirators are concerned about, the majority consensus, not totality consensus.

Furthermore, the conspirators have used these indoctrinated (and misused) buzz words to calm their sheeple whenever a story arises puplicly about a conspiracy, cover-up, or political corruption, treason, or violations of the rule of law. Buzz words like, "cult", "militia group", "right-wing extremists", "anti-government", "gun-nut", "conspiracy theorist", etc, etc. When used immediately after an "event" becomes public, these words all make people feel comfortable knowing that such sources of information cannot possibly hold merit and must be readily discounted for what they are. People fall back into their trances, and forget all about it...mission accomplished, no need to shed blood.

Tom, I don't know about you, but I personally do not want anyone else doing my thinking or decision making for me. That certainly doesn't sound like being free to me. I'll look at everything with a critical eye, analyze several points of view, draw my own conclusions, and then decide whether the "official line" is a pile of dead fish or not. Thank you very much.

A few years ago, I was "encouraged" into doing some research on this subject from a retired Marine Corps officer. Everything he suggested, every idea he proposed, and every place to look for more information has panned out ten-fold. Without the 2 or 3 hours I had with him discussing these "crazy conspiracy" ideas, I would have never thought to look further. I was comfortably satisfied with the "official line". But it wasn't in my nature to ignore these claims. Maybe I needed to hear the things I didn't want to believe from someone credible, like a former Marine Intelligence officer, to nudge me into thinking for myself. But, that's all it took, just a little nudge. And what I've found to date, would certainly make anyone feel uncomfortable.

Denial is a difficult thing to overcome. We always look for the easy way out and the most comfortable things to hear, and then accept without question, things that to a trained eye are obviously dirty. Denial no doubt spawns apathy and complacency. These are our real enemies in our fight to regain freedom. Once we overcome our own denial of the truth, we can begin to think for ourselves, shedding the yokes of control that have been placed on our minds. That to me, sounds alot like the makings of free men.


[This message has been edited by Paul Revere (edited April 06, 2000).]
 
If CNN, NBC, NPR, NYT, WSJ, etc. represent one extreme in reporting, and David Icke, Art Bell, et al represent the other extreme; wouldn't one expect to find the truth somewhere in the middle?

Accepting either extreme without thinking is equally foolish.

I'll quote Paul Revere, as I have no words that express this as well as he has already written, "I'll look at everything with a critical eye, analyze several points of view, draw my own conclusions, and then decide..."


------------------
RKBA!
"The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security"
Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 4 Concealed Carry is illegal in Ohio.
Ohioans for Concealed Carry Website
 
Back
Top