What is the smallest pistol caliber you would carry with you in bear country?

S

Super-Dave

New member
I am not talking about dealing with grizzly bears or polar bears. I mean just every day black bears.

My friend claims that carrying a 9mm with 147 grain fmj is sufficient for black bears. I claim the very least should be .45 acp 230 grain fmj.

Is 9mm fmj sufficient? Is .45 acp fmj sufficient?

I have toyed with the idea of 147 grain in .357 sig.

I am not talking about hunting the bear, I mean if you get attacked while your rifle is not in reach.

If none of theses are acceptable, in your opinion what is the absolute smallest pistol caliber you would carry in bear country?
 
.22lr ruger.... Hey you asked what is the smallest I would carry in bear country. There are squirrels in bear country too:D:rolleyes:.
Smallest I would carry to use on attacking bears is a .45acp but would prefer .45colt or so...
Brent
 
This is the question I wanted addressed a little while ago. I don't have a 10mm and won't get my .357 til after I get back from alaska. I have a .45 and wanted to know if .45super or +P would suffice at protection. Didn't really get an answer. I think those commenting thought I was hunting bears... My opinion, any gun is better than clacking two sticks together. Take a decent sized knife as well. And KNOW your surroundings.
 
I would venture to say that at the distance of self defense scenario a .45acp placed well will do plenty of damage. Any size round that misses the key points of impact is equal to the 2 sticks you mention clacking together... i hate to hear that any animal has this super thick skull etc... I know of a rancher that raises bison and he uses a .22lr to dispatch them for slaughter.
I use a pellet rifle to dispatch wild hogs for slaughter. I am just pointing out that a well placed shot is crucial and paramount to caliber, velocity, energy or even ballistic co-efficient...
Brent
 
Daniel Boone killed a lot of bears with a 127gr ball fired at black powder velocities.

I wouldn't like to have to defend myself with a pistol against a bear, but bears aren't as bullet proof as the average internet expert believes they are.
 
I've carried either a 1911 loaded with 230 ball, or a SP101 loaded with 200 grain hardcast .357 mags. This was in Alaska no less, and while neither would be my first choice for huge bears, they were what I had along and I was certain they'd beat a 'pocket full of dreams' about the .454 Alaskan I'll buy one of these days.

My plan for discouraging things that can eat me is to start shooting early, shoot lots and aim for the brain or spine as much as possible.
 
I once hit a 200lb female with 4 shots from a 45-70 before she quit running. Twice in the lungs, 1 heart shot and 1 neck shot. I load my 405g Hornady's to 1800 fps, so I wasn't throwing spitballs. After that experience, I'm not sure I would recommend a pistol for much more than ******* off a bear. Grizzly, Polar, Black, White, whatever.
 
As with all these hypotheticals, whether it's bears, bank robbers, deer, insurgents, automobile parts, etc., the answers are "what you've got" and "what you can shoot." If you don't have the .357/10mm, then .45 or 9mm is what will do.

Few news articles I recall include: a man lung-ing a bear that was attacking his dog with a .22 rimfire , they found it piled up some hours later; a man who killed a brown bear with a knife after he lost his rifle in an attack while hunting; and another guy killing a bear who was attacking his kids - by smashing the bear's noggin with a log. Then, to RLFD5415's point, we hear about bears (and other animals) soaking up ridiculous punishment and keep rolling.

We don't want to be in either of those situations - stuck with nothing substantial to defend ourselves, or facing superbear. But in those extreme instances, you've got to believe that your clock is just up, or it's not. In the vast majority of instances, I'd say most popular centerfire service rounds are adequate medicine. Yes, there's a chance a bear skull might deflect a smaller bullet. Yes, there's a chance you will lack vital penetration, especially if you carry HPs. Yes, if I was going, I'd bring the .44 mag as a sidearm, because it's there. But there's no use second-guessing with what you've got, and a 5 hits with a trusty .45 is better than no hits with a new magnum.

As a disclaimer, I've never hunted bear, some day hopefully, but I think some common-sense analysis always benefits these scenario-based questions.
 
i dont walk to the condo dumpster after dark without a firearm. we got a bad black bear problem and they arent afraid of people, they stare at my doberman off the front balcony(eye level) and eat the azalea bushes and ******* at the end of the steps while she barks from 25/30 feet. right around twilight/dusk...later they bang at the dumpster door and drag trash out of my pickup...a general nuisance.
here they are protected, they flourish, and they grow more and more friendly.:rolleyes:

but this is usually more prevalent during the spring.
 
Is there some controversy over which manstopper calibers are "best"Seems some think the 9 is inadequate because it is small bore and the 9 lovers say a .45 lacks penetration but in general they are in the zone for people stoppers.No one feels terribly overgunned in an SD situation with any common SD cartridge.In an SD round,too much penetration is bad.

This is the class of cartridge being discussed.

All of these handguns for use on humans are popular.
So,people want to feel better about being in bear country carrying them.
You can do what you want.
I know what it was like to hear my wife scream don't let the bear bite me again.I know what it was like to kill him.I know what it is like to be 200 river miles from the nearest road .
I know what it is like to stand squared off with the bear and put a 12 ga slug,which is a 400 gr projectile at 1200 fps midline center in a bear's mouth and had him go down and get right back up again.
You see,that was one of those moments where I dsicovered a disconnect between my expectations and reality.
I wanted a bigger gun.

You do whatever you want.
 
To answer your question,what would Ross Seyfred or Elmer Kieth carry?
Ross was a world champ combat shooter with a 1911,but I'll bet either Ross or Elmer would agree that a heavy loaded Ruger single action in .45 Long Colt or .44 Magnum with heavy hard cast Kieth bullets would be on the short list of good choices.Of course,the DA's have advantages,but a 4 5/8 SA Blackhawk carries easy and works every time. They don't cost much.
 
My minimum would be 22LR as that is what I might be more likely to have with me. But if I chose a handgun for this purpose, it would be a 357 mag or 41 mag revolver. A 45 or 44 is just fine too.

I bet the father of the 8-year old from Boca Raton FL would have liked to have had either with them during the August attack in the Great Smoky Mountain National Park. It happened near the trailhead for the Rainbow Falls Trail up Roaring Fork above Gatlinburg. The father and son involved were lucky and received minor wounds (stitches and staples to repair) and were treated and released from the hospital after the attack.

It appears that the Smoky Mt NP has modified some of their rules and postings about bears. Attacks are up along with the black bear population. More problems expected. They are recommending bear spray be carried by back country hikers/campers. No guns yet....
 
When I was doing a bit more hiking I carried my .45 acp and knew several other hikers that carried the same caliber. I use a .44 mag for my woods carry gun nowdays because that is the most suitable gun I have. I'm not particularly concerned with bears around here though they tend to be smaller and always have turned and run away in my encounters. I am more concerned with stumbling across tweakers than bears.
 
a 147 9mm is a very good penatrator not my first choice, but I'm not real worried about blackbear so I'd probably just carry whatever I'm packing at the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top