Wendy's shooting - WHY DIDN'T LAW KEEP MONSTER IN HIS CAGE?

Oatka

New member
http://www.nypost.com/commentary/4743.htm

WHY DIDN'T LAW KEEP MONSTER IN HIS CAGE?

JOHN TAYLOR, the suspected shooter in the Wendy's massacre, should have been behind bars.

But an incredible case of junk justice allowed him to go free as a bird and become the alleged architect of one of the city's most sickening blood baths.

If you speak to the Queens district attorney's office, they will tell you it is all the fault of a judge who gave the 36-year-old Taylor low-ball bail when they had him dead to rights.

If you to talk to the people of the New York state court system, they will tell you it was the fault of a bumbling district attorney's office too lazy to indict.

Surely this must be great solace for the loved ones of the deceased who awoke to the news they had a gaping hole in their future after fiends in Flushing completed their handiwork.

Mary DeBourbon, spokeswoman for the Queens district attorney's office, said: "On June 24 of last year, a man by the name of John Taylor appeared before Judge Pauline Mullings.

"He was there to face two charges of armed robbery, and the district attorney's office asked for $100,000 bail.

"The judge set bail at $3,500, which we believe was very light considering the seriousness of the charge."

And considering that this mutt was already on five years' probation for an aborted robbery, it was doggone light.

But David Bookstaver, spokesman for the New York state court system, was quick to fire back a broadside.

"Taylor could not make bail, and the bail was high enough to keep Taylor at Rikers Island for six weeks before he finally got out.

"Don't start blaming the judge, and I'll tell you why," Bookstaver said.

"Can anyone tell me why the district attorney did not indict Taylor in those six weeks? You can't bitch about the bail unless there is a move to indict.

"If the DA was concerned, regarding the amount of the bail, why didn't the office indict him and reargue bail?"

DeBourbon of the district attorney's office countered: "There were negotiations ongoing about a plea of up to 12 years in jail. It is not the policy of the district attorney's office to bring in cops and witnesses for an indictment when negotiations for a plea are underway."

Bookstaver of the state court system shot back: "They offered him 12 years. No wonder he splits."

And split he did.

At one stage, when Taylor was due for a court appearance, he called up and said he couldn't make it because he was in a hospital. Apparently, everyone swallowed that one hook, line and sinker.

DeBourbon: "Regardless of this case, Judge Jeffrey Leibowitz issued a bench warrant for Mr. Taylor on Nov. 5 of last year."

It's not as if Taylor, one of the alleged killers in the heartbreak of Flushing, was a master criminal who bamboozled the court system.

In 1996, he worked as a manager at 341 Fifth Ave., a McDonald's. He shifted his job to another McDonald's at 22 E. 42nd St.

Then he decided on a career move when he went back to the Fifth Avenue store to rob the place. His former workers, who aborted the robbery, identified him and the cops picked him up. Hence the probation.

Fast forward to June 19, 1999, when he goes to a McDonald's at 44-06 Greenpoint Avenue in Sunnyside, Queens and heists the joint for $1,100.

On June 23, he goes back to toss the joint again. Linabel Taberas recognized him as the same guy who held her up only four days before.

"Is this the same thing?" Linabel asked Taylor. Taylor was obliging. "He said: ‘Yes,' " picked up $400, placed it in a McDonald's bag and fled the scene.

Police Officer Michael Garcia of the 108th Precinct collared him real quick.

"It's the same old thing. We pick 'em up and the courts and the big shots in the district attorney's office let them go," a senior police officer said yesterday.

It is hard for anyone to arm-wrestle with either the DA's office or Judge Pauline Mullings. I'm no referee here.

I'm just glad I don't have to explain what happened to the victims' loved ones.
 
Along with companies that limit an employees RIGHT to defend him/herself, a judicial system that permits repeat felons easy prey should be held accountable for aiding and abetting crime.

It appears that one of the alleged Wendy massacre suspects, John Taylor, while no master criminal, had learned from past strategy - eliminate witnessess. That he is not very smart and this drastic strategy didn't preserve his freedom is hardly cause for us to rejoice.
Jeff
 
And now we can sit back for the blame game, as the two (?) suspects accuse one another of pulling the trigger and the judicial clods continue to duck responsibility.
Jeff
 
Someday, the people will hold the DA's that refuse to prosecute and the judges that treat criminals like victims accountable. Then and only then will this nation see a dramtic decrease in crime.

Someone once said that the president can not control local courts or prisons systems. This is true, but the federal administration can set the climit. If King Willie would threaten to withhold federal revenue sharing dollars (our tax money) to states that do not follow a no-nonsense attitude towards violent criminals, these animals would not be on the street.

I morn for the families of the victims. And hope that John Kely and his accomplise burn in hell. And I also hope there is a place right next to John Kelly for the liberals that created a system that allows monsters like him to walk free among the innocent.



------------------
Joe Portale
Tucson, Arizona Territory

True Gun Control: Weaver or Isosceles.
 
Consider this news carefully in the context of New York's laws to disarm potential victims.

The city oppresses honest civilians to prevent them from defending themselves. They treat known, violent felons with such little 'care'.

Put those two facts together, and it is hard to avoid calling that an evil, disgusting 'system' of government.

Regards from AZ
 
Ok, so what are we going to do about it? The NRA has been screaming about enforcing existing laws. Here is a blatent, high-profile example of what happens when you don't. NRA members, write and suggest this get used. If someone can find links to the mayors office, Senator and Reps. lets start writing!!!!!!!!!!! This is an opportunity to fight back but we must hurry!
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Liberty requires vigilance!
 
The anti's have done things like ask the NRA how many more children will they get killed before they change their stance. I think it is a legitimate question to turn the tables and ask the MMM and others how many more innocents will they condemn before they support honest people's right to carry weapons to defend themselves. Do they feel good that they have caused the deaths of these people? How about it Chuck Shumer? Jerry
 
This is clearly the gun's fault. Had this criminal been liscensed and had a trigger lock in place, none of this would have happened! :D
 
After working in the system for years, I no longer believe in the system.

I work at a facility for teenage rapists and child molesters (mostly child molesters, and most of them molested family members). Our program runs about 3 years and is treatment/correctional.

If a kid in our facility screws up (assaults staff, assaults other kids, or basically refuses treatment), after a huge rigamarole of red tape we *can* send them to a regular lockup (juvie or big-boy jail depending on their age).

Know what happens every time we do that?

They're home within a month.

Instead of serving our admittedly somewhat cushy three years with Nintendo, high school and "family day" on Sunday, they are sent home, unrehabilitated, to the place where they committed their offenses in the first place. FOR NO REASON! It's not good behavior! It's not "time served!" They are just inevitably released at the first review!

And we wonder why crime is so high.

It's not the guns on the streets -- it's the CRIMINALS on the streets! Get a clue, people!

------------------
*quack*

[This message has been edited by duck hunt (edited May 29, 2000).]
 
Back
Top