Welcome to the Union of American Socialist Republics

dev_null

New member
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124358,00.html

Private Property May Become Preserved
Saturday, July 10, 2004

KING COUNTY, Wash. — Residents of King County, Wash., will only be able to build on 10 percent of their land, according to a new law being considered by the county government, which, if enacted, will be the most restrictive land use law in the nation.

Known as the 65-10 Rule, it calls for landowners to set aside 65 percent of their property and keep it in its natural, vegetative state. According to the rule, nothing can be built on this land, and if a tree is cut down, for example, it must be replanted. Building anything is out of the question.

Most of the residents who will be directly affected by the regulations — those who own property in the rural areas of the country — are fuming. They see the new regulations as a land grab and a violation of their property rights.

"My take is it's stealing — out and out stealing," said county resident Marshall Brenden. "They're taking 65 percent of your land that you fought for years to pay for, paid mortgages on and now you can't use it."

But supporters and environmentalists say personal property rights do not trump the rights of a larger community to save the eco-system.

"We're trying to keep the rural area a place that isn't just McMansions and ball courts, but instead has those natural processes," said Tim Trohimovich of the group 1000 Friends of Washington, which aims to promote healthy communities and cities while protecting farmland and forests.

The plan is being pushed by King County Executive Ron Sims, who is currently running for governor.
 
the time to take to the streets is getting closer and closer. Pretty soon, bread and circuses ain't gonna be enough to placate the citizens. They will begin to actively fear, resent and resist their government as they come to recognize it as a bigger and bigger threat to their lives, property and liberty. It's a hard rain that's gonna fall.
 
They think this will stop suburban sprawl? That's what I'm most worried about, having grown up in St. Charles, Missouri, and watched the houses pop up. As soon as someone wants a subdivision, that land is going to be rezoned, and then developed. Probably after the contracter has his claws on it, so he doesn't have to pay a whole lot to get it.
 
Get off your fat, dumb, believing-the-AARP, Social-Security-is-my-highest-priorty-butts and vote the socialists out!


:mad:



Sorry, I'm just a little sick of "The Greatest Generation" voting us into a police state.
 
It amazes me how much people will put up with. Every year it seems I hear more about laws telling people what kind of grass/trees they can plant, when they can mow/water lawns, burn wood stoves/fire places, color they can paint their homes, whether they can fly the flag, etc. etc.. Simply amazing.
 
You buy the land, it's yours, if other people want the land to they eco-friendly stuff....then they can buy their own to do it with. I'd be somewhat tempted to just put a layer of concrete over all my land, or some chemical that will stay in the ground for 20 years killing all plantlife - start up a mass movement!

"look buddy, if you want to plant trees...do it in your own garden"
 
I think the Seattle area has finally surpassed Berkley and Madison as the most insane Socialists in this country.

You people up there REALLY need to rally to this one and let these ******** know that your limit for this crap has finally been reached. :mad:
 
But supporters and environmentalists say personal property rights do not trump the rights of a larger community to save the eco-system.
Marx would be proud. The Founding Fathers would be ashamed. "community rights."
 
It's all a bunch of F...ing BS, whats mine is mine, buy yours and I won't bother you, but try to take mine and we'll have a problem. :mad:
 
Back
Top