I won't comment on any legal implications of that situation, but I will comment on the social implications, that whilst not mentioned directly, are one of the factors behind such situations.
I fail to see why the lack of any muslims in a town would make talking to a bonafide, legitimate news agency something bad.
It seems to me the word "muslim" is increasingly lumped together with other words like "extrememist muslim", or "fundametalist muslim", or "muslim terrorist". The latter three all contain the word "muslim". That does not make them the same thing as the word "muslim".
Aljazeera is a cable news network, run as a business that happens to be based on the the U.A.E. That is it.
Let's not confuse a muslim TV network, with a TV network whose market happens to be muslims countries. You would not call CNN a christian TV network beacuse it broadcasts to predominantly christian viewers, would you?
The fact that they are often cited as the source for another hate-vid by this group or that, is more a case of to whom these groups send their videos or messages.
If Al-Qaeda sent their next tape to CNN, would they send it back? Hell, no! News is their bread and butter, like Aljazeera's. You give them a story that will get airtime ratings, they will broadcast it. Period.
Having said all that, I can sort of see why both the reporter and the super got mixed up...