wat scope is better

Not familiar with the Tru-Glo. Mueller stuff is excellent. I've had two 4-16 X 50AO sport dot scopes on my rifles (with sunshades) and my only complaint is that they were heavy (as most scopes that size are). The two guys that bought them hang around in here and from what I've heard are very satisfied with them.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • mueller.jpg
    mueller.jpg
    137.7 KB · Views: 131
Last edited:
I'm a fan of Mueller scopes and from my experience they are higher quality than Tru-Glo(not a fan). I own a Mueller Eraticator and have been very satisfied with it in every respect. I've only heard good things about the Target model and actually would have bought it over the Eraticator if it were offered in silver. I will say its more suited for target work than hunting though. It's big, heavy and the tiny reticle may tend to get lost in shadows or dim light....
 
out of the two muller is the better hands down. Dont get me wrong neither is top shelf but the truglo i had was a piece of junk. I wouldnt put one on a 22.
 
I have a 8-32x40 Mueller target use it on a 223 rifle that had a Nikon Monarch
5-20x44, the Mueller glass is better,less tiring to the eyes on higher power
has never lost zero, for $240 difficult to beat.
 
I've had two Muellers - the APF and the Eraticator. I sold the APV with a rifle, and I still have the Eraticator. Both are execellent scopes.
 
IMHO a 8-32×44 scope is way to much for hunting. A 3-10 or 4.5-14 would serve you much better. More than enough power for the longest ethical game kill and low enough you have some reasonable field of view at closer ranges. Save the 8-32 for long range targets.

My 6.5-20X50 Vortex Viper is plenty of power for 1000 yd shooting.

I'm a Mueller fanboy, I have a APV and TAC II, both have been excellent scopes far surpassing my expectations.
 
8-32x on a hunting gun? My Lord you must be pullin our legs right?

Don't have experience with either scope but you don't need OR WANT anywhere near 8-32x glass on ANY hunting gun. Buy something a lot more reasonable like a 3-9x or 4-16x. Hell, I prefer 2-7x and my scopes top out at 3-9x. Geez, where do people come up with this stuff?

LK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top