Bartholomew Roberts
Moderator
The author of the WaPo piece on the legalization of suppressors made the claim in his article that .22LR was a "high-powered" rifle; but when challenged on that "fact" chose to double-down on his assertion and mock his challengers as ignorant: http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/10/washington-post-reporter-doubles-down-on-fake-news-about-guns/
I thought this was an excellent example of the kind of bias 2A activists often face in telling their side of the story, although despite the blatant errors was still one of the more balanced articles on guns since it at least gave the opposition a chance to make their case before completely ignoring the solid factual points they made.
I thought this was an excellent example of the kind of bias 2A activists often face in telling their side of the story, although despite the blatant errors was still one of the more balanced articles on guns since it at least gave the opposition a chance to make their case before completely ignoring the solid factual points they made.