DeusComedis
Inactive
I have generally been under the impression that HK and SIG (though that might be changing) are considered to make the best consistent quality production handguns (not custom/$2000). I have always been a little confused on Walther.
On one hand their guns feel solid (to me in the LGS at least), and I hear few complaints overall, aside from one or two very specific issue (e.g. slide rattle on original P99s). On the other, people say that their design/fit and finish is top notch, but their long term durability/adverse conditions reliable has never matched HK/SIG. Supposedly this is why while some LE agencies use them, they have never been adopted by a major military (at least since WWII). Is this accurate, or is it just a result of them being a relatively small company. Candid truth please.
Thanks.
On one hand their guns feel solid (to me in the LGS at least), and I hear few complaints overall, aside from one or two very specific issue (e.g. slide rattle on original P99s). On the other, people say that their design/fit and finish is top notch, but their long term durability/adverse conditions reliable has never matched HK/SIG. Supposedly this is why while some LE agencies use them, they have never been adopted by a major military (at least since WWII). Is this accurate, or is it just a result of them being a relatively small company. Candid truth please.
Thanks.