I wonder why this pistol hasn't caught on more than it has. I think it is a magnificent pistol that has great attributes. It shoots great for me (and my wife) and is a well finished piece of solid engineering.
The price on them has dropped down as of late and it has the unbeatable Tennifer finish, as well as second strike capability (at the very least, convenient for dryfiring).
If this means anything, a '98 issue of GunTests pitted the Walther against the Glock 17, the USP9, and the Ruger P95. They rated the P99 the best and it ate the other pistols lunch in the accuracy tests. I know other people will say that's poppycock, but it IS in print and GunTests is about as unbiased as you can get in a gun rag.
On a side note, do any of you P99 .40 owners reload for it? I don't have a Glock .40 for comparison sake, but it seems to me to have a somewhat unsupported chamber. How does the case support compare on the P99 to the Glock 22/23? Blades, if there is ONE shortcoming to this pistol (at least in .40), the chamber support might be it, but we'll see what the others have to say.