Video, Two of my .22 caliber Stoeger Lugers.

Bill Akins

New member
Stoeger has owned the copyright to the name "Luger" on a product, since the 1920's. These .22 LR caliber Lugers are not an exact P08 parabellum
as designed by Georg Luger, but they legally are a Luger and they are (debateably) close in resemblance as well as have a working
toggle which does somewhat retard (delay) the otherwise straight blowback bolt. So it is correctly termed as a retarded/delay blowback action as opposed to the P08's action being recoil operated.

Some people claim these are not Lugers. But they legally are Lugers. They just aren't constructed exactly the same as the P08 was designed originally by Georg Luger. My all steel frame one has the heft and feel of a P08 while my aluminum frame ones are much lighter.

The Stoeger Luger is superior to the .22 cal Erma P08 style which was made of questionable pot metal with a steel sleeve for a barrel encased in pot metal and most of the other parts as well as the Erma's frame are zinc type "Zamac" pot metal. These being the only working toggle .22 caliber Lugers and Luger (type) pistols mass produced (not including .22 conversion kits
for larger caliber lugers), it therefore is common for some people to confuse the Stoeger's and the Erma's and to even think they are the same pistol. Both have been out of production for decades.

The Erma looks a lot more like the P08, but the pot metal parts commonly crack and break. The Stoeger, even with the aluminum frame version, holds up excellent. I know. I have two alum frame ones and one steel frame one and I have been inside them and worked on them to smooth up their operation. Most complaints on these fine pistols are made by people who do not know what to do, such as polish the feed ramp, micro chamfer the breech edge so it won't catch the head of the bullet and jam against the breech, bend (if necessary) the mag feed lips to aid feeding. Replace a worn extractor spring. Most of the public will not know these things nor do them and that, along with incorrectly lumping them in with the inferior pot metal Erma's, is why some people call them "Jam-a-matics". But they aren't. If they did the things I mentioned like I have, their Stoeger .22 Lugers would work fine.

The .22 Stoeger Luger's toggle assembly is steel as is the bolt which rides in steel recesses not in aluminum recesses as well as the entire barrel is all steel, as opposed to the Erma barrel which is a steel sleeve
encased by zamac pot metal. So all steel where it was needed was used in the aluminum frame Stoeger and the aluminum frame was rated at 82000 psi. So it is very sturdy.
The Stoeger steel frame ones are even sturdier and feel just like a regular P08 in weight and heft. It is a pleasure to shoot both Stoeger frame types.


The Stoeger company of today, is not the same Stoeger company which produced these .22 caliber Lugers although they still own the copyright to the name "Luger" on a product.
Unfortunately, records of the old Stoeger company were lost or not kept, as to the exact production date of each individual Stoeger Luger.
So all we can know is the aluminum frame Stoeger Lugers were made from 1969 to 1979 and the Stoeger all steel frame ones were made from 1980 to 1985.

Hope you enjoy the video.

http://vimeo.com/118525608


Bill Akins


.
 
Stoeger Lugers have long been one of my favorites....probably because it was the first handgun I purchased when turning 21. A little searching and you can find checkered grips available that resemble the originals (I've found both pressed and cut grips). Also have a rare Stoeger Luger "Target version" that included adjustable rear sights.

Have never experienced the jams some talk about, mine have functioned flawlessly.

StogerLuger2_zpsef8f77e6.jpg


IMG_0514_zps7d8d2044.jpg
 
That's a nice brace of aluminum frame ones you have there Rembrandt. Look to be in excellent condition. My steel frame one has the checkered grips, but my other two aluminum frame ones have plain non checkered grips. I've been trying to find several nice sets to put on my aluminum frame ones but haven't seen any decent ones on Ebay nor Gunbroker. The grips being checkered really helps with the looks of it more resembling the larger caliber earlier Lugers. Where did you find the checkered grips at of which you speak? I need two sets.
 
Bill -

Good info for us Lugerphiles and interesting posts and video, thanks much. The slow motion shows the toggle action nicely. It would be nice to handle and break down one of these and compare it with a P08 or earlier Luger.

One thing... I don't think the word Stoeger is exactly pronounced "Stow-ger". It's more like "Shtoy-guh", with the accent on the first syllable. I'm not a native German speaker but was able to look it up and get an audio version at

http://imtranslator.net/translate-and-speak/#

You should be able to listen to it at http://tts.imtranslator.net/VQld by pressing the "Say It" button on the right side.
 
Thanks Spacecoast, glad you enjoyed it. And thanks for the info on the correct pronunciation of the name "Stoeger". The German "umlaut" (hope I spelled that correctly) can really change the sound of a word going from English to German.
 
Have one of both...but the ERMA is a .32acp, built a bit better with more steel than the .22's :)

Got to admit, I'd LOVE to see a new .32acp copy of the ERMA KGP68A in all-steel...
this little pistol quickly became a favorite after the first range visit!

Given the state of CNC these days, it is very do-able...
question is, will anyone with a CNC mini-robot (about $2k) do it?
and further, would they do it affordably, which was the main bonus of the ERMA's??
 
I hear ya Big Shrek. Would be nice if someone produced a .22 Luger that looked exactly like the Erma .22, except this time add on that rectangular piece on the left side of the frame that is on 30 cal and 9mm lugers, so that the .22 Erma's left frame side looked EXACTLY like the larger caliber Lugers. And then make all those Erma parts out of steel instead of pot metal. Make the barrel all steel instead of pot metal with a steel sleeve like the Erma is.

I know what you mean Big Shrek. The .32 and .380 Ermas were steel and actually more closely matched the dimensions of the regular larger caliber lugers even though they were scaled down versions. They were the best of the Erma's. It's sad Erma used such inferior pot metal (even on critical toggle main parts) for their .22's. Yes hands down the Erma looks more like a P08 Parabellum, but it doesn't have all critical parts made of steel. So for a shooter right now, the Stoeger is the best. If only....if only.....someone would buy a like new Erma .22, scan it, then laser print it in steel. That's the future. I can see one day every home will have a "replicator". Then we can either create our own programs and laser print them or buy programs from others to print out in our rapid prototyping printers. Lots of long out of production guns could be brought back then. This is the future of home use and rapid prototyping.


.
 
Not sure I can steer you to a set of grips. Got one pair of checkered grips from a local gun shop 25 years ago.....the other set from a gun show.
 
I'm really surprised no one currently makes a .22 facsimile of the Luger P08.

It seems like it'd really sell, it's cool to see how Stoeger incorporated the "toggle link" into there gun.
 




These are mine. One I bought from a shop who tried to use it as a rental, but it constantly jammed. I got it, and oiled it, and guess what? no jams! :D
 
It's nice to see some appreciation for the old Stoeger Luger. I bought mine, an aluminum frame model, back in 1971. Got the pistol, a leather holster, two
mags and a mag loading tool, all for $55.00.

I never had much of a problem with it jamming as long as I used a good quality ammo. It really likes the CCI Stinger, and it's very accurate with that
brand. Other than a Ceiner conversion kit for my series 70 Colt, it's the only
.22 pistol I have. Actually that's not true, I have a Beretta 21A, but I don't even count it because it really IS a jam-o-matic.

The only problem I ever had with the Stoeger was a broken sear. Looking at it, I think it was probably a bad heat-treat. It just snapped in half. But try finding one of those for sale, anywhere. I finally badgered my brother, who was a machinist, into building one for me. It works perfectly and the gun is still shooting ten years later. I think I'll keep it.

Walter
 
Rummaged around and found the original box and paperwork. Here's a close up of the adjustable rear sight on the target model.

Stoeger1_zpsab9c962e.jpg


Stoeger5_zps7e3549c5.jpg


Stoeger2_zps8f1ff66b.jpg
 
Thanks for the entertaining and informative video.
Anyone who is interested in collecting neat .22s should definitely include a Luger, along with a Wolverine.
 
g.willikers wrote:
"Thanks for the entertaining and informative video. Anyone who is interested in collecting neat .22s should definitely include a Luger, along with a Wolverine."

You're welcome g.willikers. Glad you enjoyed it. Ah! the Whitney Wolverine. Now there's one I haven't seen in person in a very long time. Had a very angled grip similar to the Luger and a slide grip that looked like the toggle grips of a luger.....even though it wasn't a toggle action. Ahead of its time in styling. Probably why it didn't catch on at the time. I remember people used to deride their styling and refer to them as "space guns" and "ray guns". I would like to have one of those and always liked their styling. Real collector's items today.

9752950_1.jpg




.
 
Last edited:
Well using various brands of ammo and two magazines, my 1971 aluminum frame .22lr Stoeger was a jamomatic, even after two trips back to Stoeger. A couple local gunsmiths looked at it, pointed out hack repairs Stoeger attempted and said it wasn't worth investing money toward repairs. I finally got rid of it and got a real P08 (1913 DWM) in 1975 that works well even today. I also got a Ruger Mark I Target 22lr around 1975 that's still a gem.

I'm usually lucky picking out guns but sure got a lemon that time that even Stoeger could not fix or did not want to go to the trouble to fix. I've never forgotten that bad experience.

I am glad to hear some of you got good ones but that wasn't my experience with the single example I had. Anyway, I'm happy today since I have two P08s, it worked out.
 
A bit off topic, but...

@Bill Akins and spacecoast:

And thanks for the info on the correct pronunciation of the name "Stoeger". The German "umlaut" (hope I spelled that correctly) can really change the sound of a word going from English to German.

I don't want to sound like the grammar or pronunciation Nazi, but I grew up in a German/English household (my great-grandparents spoke little English) and I was forced to take 3 years of "High" German language classes in high school (so as not to sound like my "Low" German speaking elders.) :D

The umlaut (not on my keyboard, and pronounced "oomlowt") consists of two dots ".." above the vowel, as you all probably know. So, properly,...

When pronouncing a vowel with an umlaut, one must form the mouth/lips to pronounce the umlauted vowel and say "e". The only two vowels with umlauts that follow this rule are "o" and "u" (and umlauted "a" usually printed as "aa"). Try it, but try to keep the "oe" sound without an "r" sound in it. Not easy, but any natural speaking German (from Germany) will catch it right off. By the translation link that spacecoast posted, the speaker is not German, but English-speaking.

Awkward at first, but easily learned. My eldest (84-year-old) Aunt grew up speaking half English and half Low German and she still has no clue about how to spell or properly pronounce many German words. I often correct her in emails, but then again, I'm her grammar Nazi. And my 19-year-old grandson speaks very good proper German and chastises me.

I hope I have not derailed this thread too much.

Oh, and by the way, nice guns. :)

Jim
 
A company called "NiteScout" has resurrected the old Stoeger .22 Luger and is manufacturing it and it is all steel (no aluminum). Which makes it like the steel frame Stoeger .22 Lugers that were made from 1980 to 1985. Stoeger also made them with aluminum frames from 1969 to 1979. NiteScout calls it the P226 Parabellum. This only recently came out in September and I hadn't heard about it until several weeks ago. They can't call it a "Luger" because Stoeger owns the copyright to that name. I went to the NiteScout website and they don't even list their P226 Parabellum, (which is an almost exact copy of the old Stoeger .22 Luger). So I joined their facebook page by "liking" it and saw it posted there.....https://www.facebook.com/pages/Nitescout/582894048405787?fref=photo

Here's a couple of pics of it.

6062_zpsyq0dkjck.jpg


NiteScout%2022%20Luger_zpslyzhbinm.jpg



I posted at their NiteScout facebook page telling them that it isn't listed at their main website. On facebook they said it was available from AmChar wholesale, but it isn't listed at AmChar either nor at any of their other dealers they list at their main website. I was able to find it for FFL dealers (only) to order it from a wholeseller at this link...
https://dealers.interstatearms.com/s...&numResults=20


Just for everyone here's info, I did notice a few small differences between their P226 and the old Stoeger .22 Luger. Look carefully at the pics below. See the two projections at the breech of the P226's barrel? Then look at the pic of the old Stoeger .22 Luger that doesn't have those two projections. I theorize they most likely are an extra cartridge guide to aid the cartridge in chambering, but am not 100% sure. If so, that might be a good thing since the Stoeger .22 Lugers are picky about ammo and an extra cartridge guide to better facilitate chambering would be a welcome addition. Except for the markings on the side of the pistol, that's the only difference I can see between the NiteScout P226 and the old Stoeger .22 Lugers. Otherwise, it appears to be an exact copy.

Below, NiteScout P226 .22LR Parabellum breech. See those two projections on the breech just forward of the mag follower?

11053833_10153178519470070_2701612226576204582_n.jpg


Below see the breech of the old Stoeger .22 Luger that doesn't have those two projections.

21248_10153194943265070_1515609742125959815_n.jpg


Also the NiteScout Parabellum is available in barrel lengths of 4 and 6 inches, whereas the old Stoeger .22 Lugers were available in 4.5 and 5.5 inch barrels. Other than the barrel lengths, markings and that boltways guide/cartridge chambering aid on the breech, they are obviously an exact copy of the steel version of the old Stoeger .22 Luger. Nice to see these being produced again. Maybe that boltways guide/chambering helper will act to reduce jams that plagued a lot of Stoeger .22 Lugers. I know my Stoeger .22 Lugers work fine with solid point ammo, but they sometimes jam with hollowpoints. If NiteScout found a way to fix that, sure would be a good thing.

Just yesterday evening NiteScout replied to my questions on their facebook page regarding those projections on their P226's breech. Here's what they said:

"Bill, sorry we must have missed the post last week. The two projections you're referring to serve two purposes, to help with feeding and to align the boltways to the barrel."

Now if they would just do the same thing resurrecting the old inferior grade pot metal Erma LA .22 parabellum.....and make it out of steel this time, wouldn't that be nice too?




.
 
Back
Top