USA Today

Why does it seem to sound like it is the gun's fault?

If the accusations are true, the dealership broke numerous laws. And the people who are supposed to prevent this kind of thing are the ATF. Why isn't there a public (or at least media) outcry? 1,000 Glocks? Obtained under false pretenses, and sold to criminals? WHY didn't you stop them SOONER?????

I get a real burn when I hear about gun dealers that follow the law, every ridiculous little bit, and then get demonized because somebody used one of the guns in a crime. But here, if true, we have the opposite, the dealer who deliberatly breaks the laws, for profit.

IF TRUE, I hope the profit they get is something they don't enjoy. Especially because of the smear to the reputation of honest dealers. Jeesh, they're as bad as (some) lawyers!;)
 
I think the article was better than usual out of the press, and carries hopeful signs that even the looney media is starting to get it.

We are winning

WilddontspoilitAlaska
 
I dunno...
I read the article and it appears strangely devoid of objective fact. What, exactly, are they accused of? What, exactly, is the evidence?

Seems to me like they launched a raid on a gun store because "too many" (by somebody's count) of their guns ended up in the wrong hands, yet they're not charged with actually bringing it about.
And the Glock thing....a civil suit filed by Glock would seem to be a little more appropriate than the response here IMO. And if I understand it correctly, that information was a result of the raid, not a trigger.

Who authorized the warrant for this?
 
This stinks with Bloombergs name on it. The NRA needs to get Riley back in court again. Sounds like New Orleans is just looking for another excuse to confiscate guns again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top