Tiny,
I think you'll find the Tetra fluoropolymer is closest to the Mil-comm products. It is not much like either the MolyFusion or the Sprinco Plate +, however. Both of these products work as bore lubricants, and the MolyFusion, in particular, resists temperature well up above the melting points for fluoropolymer or even for molybdenum disulphide, if I am remembering correctly?
Back in the late 80's when Teflon (DuPont name-brand fluoropolymer) was all the rage in new gun lubes, there was a product that Smith & Wesson eventually distributed called Friction Block. It was being burnished into barrels and got velocity increases (50-100 fps in highpower rifles) and cleaning improvement results similar to the other two products in a bore, but the benchrest community soon found it actually deteriorated accuracy. Apparently the properties of the Teflon fluoropolymer tend to change too much with temperature for consistent bore behaviour as a gun heats up. I don't know about Tetra's fluoropolymer, but it comes from that same era?
On the other hand, I believe Microlon Gun Juice, another bore treatment, is also a fluoropolymer-based lube and it apparently does well, at least in small bore and hunting-accuracy rifles. I don't know whether the benchresters have messed with it? It is probably the oldest barrel lube treatment product.
Microlon Gun Juice (in smallbore) and MolyFusion are the only two products for which I've seen testimonial claims of significantly increased accuracy. Whether this is due to the lubricant or simply because it alters barrel time for the bullet to a more favorable number for the particular load being tested, I don't know? If the latter is true, adjusting the load would get the same result. Friction reduction should, theoretically, reduce barrel heating and any POI shift associated with that. This might be the another mechanism it has for improving groups?
So many experiments to try; so little range time.
Nick