I am about to buy a new pistol for CCW and am having a problem deciding between two models. The first is a Ruger SP101 in 357, and the second is a Kahr PM, either a 9mm or a 40S&W. These are my thoughts on them:
SP101 - I already have other 357's, so I have ammo, components, etc. I like the reliability of the revolver. It's also a lot cheaper.
PM9/40 - I have other 357's, so I kinda like the thought of a new cartridge. The SP is thicker and heavier, harder to carry in the pocket. The 5-shot capacity is slightly trumped by the PM's. Plus, I don't have to worry about finding a DAO or grinding off the hammer.
What are your thoughts on these? Anyone own both? Which do you like better? I also have a Smith model 65, and have considered getting a good high riding OWB holster for it and then using the PM as a backup and in situations where I want deeper concealment. Thanks.
SP101 - I already have other 357's, so I have ammo, components, etc. I like the reliability of the revolver. It's also a lot cheaper.
PM9/40 - I have other 357's, so I kinda like the thought of a new cartridge. The SP is thicker and heavier, harder to carry in the pocket. The 5-shot capacity is slightly trumped by the PM's. Plus, I don't have to worry about finding a DAO or grinding off the hammer.
What are your thoughts on these? Anyone own both? Which do you like better? I also have a Smith model 65, and have considered getting a good high riding OWB holster for it and then using the PM as a backup and in situations where I want deeper concealment. Thanks.
Last edited: