Trouble on the 'global plantation'

G

gburner

New member
With both France and Netherlands voting 'no' in the EU constitutional referendum, how does this affect plans for 'the new world order', integrated globalization, overarching spheres of economic influence bent on crushing nation/state soveriegnty under the weight of a 'one world economic reality'? Don't tell me that the slaves are revolting on the 'global plantation'? Who saw that coming...and from the toady French and stoner Dutch?
 
The French who voted "non" basically complained that the EU wasn't socialist enough...they were worried about an influx of cheap immigrant labor, and an abrogation of France's pretty extensive social benefits system.

The Dutch conservatived were worried about increased immigration as well, while the Dutch liberals were worried that extended EU authority would mean interference with the liberal Dutch policies like drug legalization.
 
What it means is Europe will sit out global development for the near future unless individual socialist countries grow a brain and decide to participate. In the short run it means currency speculators like Soros will get obscenely rich. The collapse of the Euro will send more capital into the the US enabling the US federales to spend more money and do less and less about stamping out our socialist infrastructure. Eventually European companies will have to flee the continent. An emerging trend of corporations going country-less will accelerate.

A lot of people wanted to European Union to succeed if for no other reason than to provide a counterbalance to the US (France and Chermany, for example). That won't happen in the near term.
 
I was reading that the Euro-bureaucrats intend to keep pushing ahead. They even have a provision in the treaty that says countries can vote 'no' without stopping everything. After this embarrassment, the French government will simply not make the mistake of having a referendum for the next vote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top