Trooper who confessed to fixing ticket back on duty

Wildcard

Moderator
Trooper who confessed to fixing ticket back on duty
Dec 2, 2005, 06:36 PM

NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- A state trooper who resigned after admitting he forged a judge's signature to fix a speeding ticket but was later rehired, is one reason Gov. Phil Bredesen has called for a sweeping review of the Tennessee Highway Patrol.

Questions about the case of one-time "Trooper of the Year" Jerry Dean Watson were among those raised by The Tennessean, leading the governor to order the review this week.

It includes a background check of the department's 855 commissioned officers -- which revealed 48 troopers with criminal charges on their records -- and an investigation by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation into possible additional criminal activity in the Watson case.

Bredesen said Thursday that an internal audit of the THP done during the previous governor's administration also revealed possible criminal activity, including "trading ticket fixing for liquor and food and those kinds of things." The audit has been given to the TBI for its investigation.

An internal investigation of Watson appeared to have ended prematurely when he resigned in November 2001, right after pleading guilty to the felony forgery charge, Bredesen said.

Watson acknowledged to a state investigator that he fixed the ticket of an employee of a Knoxville meat-packing firm that had been giving troopers gifts of meat for years, according to the transcript of an interview between an investigator and Watson. Watson even visited the meat packer with a THP supervisor, the transcript says.

"What they told me is that in that file, there is an interview in which the allegation was made that 'business as usual' over there was fixing tickets of the employees of the company and so on and so forth," Bredesen told The Tennessean. "If that kind of stuff happens, it is, in fact, illegal activity."

Jefferson County Circuit Judge Duane Slone sentenced Watson on Nov. 13, 2001, to 500 hours of community service, a $1,500 fine and two years' probation. "What he did strikes at the heart of the judicial system," the judge said at the time. "He is an officer sworn to protect our laws."

Slone, however, agreed to wipe Watson's record clean if he stayed out of trouble during his probation.

Watson was rehired by the THP in January 2003, after the forgery charge was expunged for meeting the terms of his judicial diversion.

About a month later, state Safety Commissioner Fred Phillips signed a letter indicating Watson had previously left state employment "in good standing."

Phillips said he did not know of Watson's previous problems until The Tennessean started inquiring about them this week. Col. Lynn Pitts, the current THP commander, also said he did not know of the previous problems until this week.

Watson, 48, declined to comment.

According to campaign finance disclosure records, Watson made a series of contributions to the 2002 campaigns of both Bredesen and his Republican opponent that year, Van Hilleary. All told, the trooper gave $1,750 to Hilleary and $500 to Bredesen, records show.

http://www.wsmv.com/Global/story.asp?S=4189307

If you will "fix" a ticket, you can not be trusted, IMO.
 
if it were up to me id fire him

I would fire him if it were up to me
any one else would be in jail and a big fine
if we cant do it why can the police do it and get a way with it
something is wrong here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
joab said:
He admitted guilt and served his time, his record was expunged

What's the problem?


The problem is that it is inexcusable to allow a lawbreaker to be an enforcer of the law. Period.


You don't see that? :confused:


-azurefly
 
So you all agree that anybody ever convicted of commiting a crime should never be allowed to resume a normal life.

And that the legal system in America is in place merely to punish and exact revenge not to rehabilitate.

By your reasoning no one ever convicted of excessive speeding or causing an accident should ever be allowed to drive again.
After all they have shown that they can't be trusted behind the wheel.

And any convicted felon no matter how petty the offense should not be allowed to own a gun
 
So you all agree that anybody ever convicted of commiting a crime should never be allowed to resume a normal life.

Nope (strawman crumbling). I just don't want anyone ever convicted of much worse than a speeding or parking ticket being an LEO -- no bribers, wife beaters, drug dealers, liars, thieves, forgers, murderers, etc. wanted. Let them go one with the rest of their life in a different occupation please.
 
And of course the obligatory straw man reference:rolleyes:

He admitted guilt served his time and his record was expunged.
He's now free to resume his life
That's the way the system works and not just with cops.

Normal citizens have their records expunged also and then are free to resume their lives.

I thought everybody here thought that cops were subject to the same system as regular citizens
 
Come on Egg, talk about your strawman

Fixing a ticket now ranks so far up above excessive speeding that it compares to wife beating and murder?
 
Here's the problem, Watson isn't a "normal" citizen. He's an officer of the law. However, during his last period as an officer of the law, he showed that he lacks the sufficient morality to obey the law himself. To the tune of using his office to commit a felony. That's moral turpitude which isn't "expungeable" since it's considered a fatal flaw in your constitution and morality.

It's also something which is a permanent & total career killer for just about any other law-related position you can think of.

So, a "normal" citizen can pick up his life again and be an accountant, officerworker, store clerk, french fry cook, or whatever even if he has been proven to have no moral values (well maybe not a school teacher but he could be just about anything else). However, an officer of the law is required to have higher moral values and cannot be guilty of moral turpitude.

Since Watson is guilty of such, he cannot be an officer of the law.
 
That's moral turpitude which isn't "expungeable" since it's considered a fatal flaw in your constitution and morality.
Slone, however, agreed to wipe Watson's record clean if he stayed out of trouble during his probation.

I may be misinterpreting "expunge" but it still qualifies in my book
 
Everyone is created equal. However, not everyone is an officer of the law.

Being an officer of the law requires that a higher moral character std be maintained AT ALL TIMES by the officer. Normal citizen can have lapses which will not affect their business standings. However, should an officer of the law have a lapse which reflects upon his inner character, then he has not maintained that higher standard.

If such lapse is sufficiently heinious to indicate a lack of morals to the point of being moral turpitude, then the officer shouldn't ever be allowed to return to duty since moral turpitude is not something from which one can "recover" unlike drug addiction (for instance).

Moral turpitude is an internal character flaw. It is not one of the things imposed upon us by society. Our morals ARE us. Our makeup, outlook, and values that create who we are and why we react in certain ways to specific stimuli. Lacking morals indicates that we are not trustable nor complete & normal human beings. Persons who are guilty of moral turpitude lack fundamental elements of character and those missing bits are not something which can be superimposed upon a fully formed and developed psyche. It's either there or it isn't.

"Expunge" is a legal term meaning to clear the criminal record of the convicted person. It has no application to anything other than that and cannot, therefore, be used to "correct" the character flaws of Mr. Watson. To do so is akin to waving a magic wand and declaring him to now be morally ok. Which does nothing in reality and certainly does not suddenly enhance Mr. Watson with moral character.
 
joab said:
Come on Egg, talk about your strawman

Fixing a ticket now ranks so far up above excessive speeding that it compares to wife beating and murder?


"Fixing a ticket" is OFFICIAL CORRUPTION -- abuse of the power of the cop's authority.

A person of that kind of character should, in my opinion, LOSE FOREVER his opportunity to represent law and order behind a badge. He is forever dubious.

Moreover, the inquiry cited in the article seems to have uncovered a veritable culture of such extralegal activity by this police department.

We can all be naive and pollyana and say that once a person -- a demonstrated scumbag -- has "served his time" he is a-okay to be your kid's babysitter, or a police officer, or a judge or elected representative, but that doesn't take into account the idea that far from everyone who goes away to prison is reformed when he gets out.


Oh, and by the way, how many of US regular citizens get to have a criminal conviction EXPUNGED upon our release from prison?!


-azurefly
 
TBO and Joab, you guys are acting as though you don't think any action by a human being should ever disqualify their character to the point where they are not trusted for a given position where trust is a requisite.

You are making it seem that you believe any given human being is just as qualified as any other to be given trust, ignoring the fact that one's actions help define the level of trust that should be placed in him.

Would you think this cop is of a moral character that should be babysitting kids?

How about that subject, actually? You're a parent, selecting a babysitter.
Would you not prefer to exclude as potential babysitters any 15-year-old girls who were known to have hung out with gang members; spent a year in juvi-hall for lighting fire to the home of a rival; been expelled from school for fighting?

Would you put that girl on the same level of qualification for the babysitting position as a girl who was a straight-A student; president of her class council; never been in trouble with the law or the school administration; 9 years in the Girl Scouts...?

How about you put a lid on the malarkey that every person who has been released from prison after his sentence was served is just as clean-slated as a person who was never in trouble to begin with.

No one believes it.


-azurefly
 
I think that the only reason the judge expunged the scum-cop's record is because, as someone mentioned, his career is useless if he cannot be believed as a police officer.

Any cop who had been convicted of taking bribes or other official impropriety could hardly be called to the witness stand in a case against an offender.

The offender's lawyer would impugn the credibility of the cop and make his testimony unbelievable to a jury. "Officer Smith, isn't it true that you were once convicted, and did time in prison, for official bribery and corruption? Why should the jury believe you today as you testify against my client? Didn't a court of law find that you were a liar?"

What good is a cop whose testimony in court is worthless?

Now, I favor the notion of the guy never getting to be a cop again; not expunging his conviction record so that he can get a jury to believe him henceforth.


-azurefly
 
How about you put a lid on the malarkey that every person who has been released from prison after his sentence was served is just as clean-slated as a person who was never in trouble to begin with.
Enter the Strawman
F_WS0154.gif
 
TBO said:
So you're saying Human Beings have no place in Law Enforcement?


You said that.
Who's erecting strawmen? :rolleyes:


No one said that human beings have no place in law enforcement. We're trying to get through to you (and failing, evidently) the notion that not all people's characters are to fairly be assumed to be equal, especially not those who have proven to be prone to severe character deficiencies in the past, PARTICULARLY those in whom the public's trust is placed.


We know that human beings have flaws. We should be endeavoring to weed out those with the specific kinds of flaws that are very bad in a police officer so that they can't hold that office.

We're not holding out for a perfect human specimen before we can fill the job of police officer. But dammit, it makes no sense to fill that job with people of PROVEN corruption when there are people who have never been proven corrupt.


-azurefly
 
Back
Top