Trimming .44 Rem Mag Cases for consistent crimp?

A

ADClope

New member
Is this necessary?

Picked up my first revolver lately (SW 686), chambered in .44 Rem Mag.

I do trim all of my rifle brass, but have not, historically trimmed 9/45.

But it seems that the crimp is more important out of this platform, and with differing case lengths, the crimp will be inconsistent.

So my thought was trim them all to the "trim to length" and then set crimp.

Just wondering if this is necessary.
 
If using brass all from the same lot it shouldn't be necessary to trim. If using random batches of brass it might be helpful to trim them all to consistent lengths.

FWIW a 686 should be .357 Magnum. A model 69 would be the L frame .44 Magnum.
 
You'll find that very few experienced revolver shooters trim brass. You'll also find that brass is longest after it's sized, so don't use the pre-sizing length for your case length. If you buy brass in bulk, you'll never have to trim it. I have brass that's thirty years old and has been loaded dozens of times and it doesn't need trimmed. If it fits inside the cannelure of the bullet it will crimp consistent enough that you won't be able to measure any difference in accuracy between trimmed and untrimmed. Some powders require a good crimp for uniform ignition....such as H110 and W296. A lot of powders aren't the least bit fussy. With the heavy recoiling revolver loads a crimp does more to keep the bullet in place during recoil than having it uncrimped and moving and jamming the gun. Don't get too hung up on the crimp thing regarding accuracy in a handgun....it's just not critical unless you are using a lot of junk range pick-up brass.
 
I started reloading the 44 Magnum in about '90 and have reloaded everything from a 123 gr ball over a dusting of Bullseye to a 310 gr "ingot" over a near max. charge of WC820 for T-Rex hunting. I have gotten some very accurate ammo and from my Dan Wesson 44H, I got many sub 2" groups at 50' (indoors range). My Puma will give good groups also; 3"-4" @ 50 yards (I'm not the worlds best open sight shooter). I use a standard roll crimp, a Redding Profile crimp and the last couple years I have used a Lee collet crimp. I have yet to trim a 44 case...

I believe it's one of those "if you wanna, go ahead" things. I doubt if you will see much if any improvement in performance or accuracy, but it will give you something to do on a boring Saturday afternoon (or make you feel better about your handloads...;))...
 
Never owned a 44mag. But, have loaded a lot of 32 Long, 9mm, 38 spec ans 357 mag. My experience is that straight wall case's simply never need trimming.
 
If your reloading is a real craft, you will do whatever is necessary to ensure that all the brass running through a particular die setting is the same length within pretty strict tolerance. At the power and pressure levels of the 44 Mag, even moderate reloads, the quality of the crimp can effect performance, if you need a practical justification beyond craftsmanship.
 
I have a S&W model 29 44 Mag . I trim all the brass to the same length with a roll crimp. Never had a problem .
 
This is what I do for 45 Colt, which is essentially no different from 44 Magnum: All new and once-fired brass gets trimmed to consistent length, one time, and never again. In my tight-chambered Vaquero, they just don't grow in length. For conventional seater-crimper dies, you really do need to have consistent case length to get a consistent crimp. That being said, there are some other crimp-only dies that are worth having, where case length is less critical.
 
Different manufacturers have different length brass. If you want to use mixed head stamp brass across you loads then yes you should trim. If you separate head stamps into different lots and adjust to each lot you shouldn’t need to BUT, I have found brass that was very out of square at the case mouth. Trimming will alleviate this if the brass remains long enough to be at spec.

I use any 44 mag brass that is to short and cut it down to 44 special length.

So yes, depending on your objective (consistent crimp) and how fastidious you are trimming can be necessary. But once a peice of brass is trimmed you most likely will never need to trim it again.
 
I've never trimmed a straight walled case. From .32 to .45. Been reloading since the 80s. Rifle yes. Revolver/Pistol no.
 
You'll find that very few experienced revolver shooters trim brass.
Click to expand...

No one has a way to know that, but they can project that there are lots of others like them. Deciding to trim brass is not for lack of experience.
 
I tried to avoid it. Was in denial for years. But . . .

Different manufacturers will have different length brass. They stretch at different rates. Different loadings will have different stretch. The list of variables goes on and on.

When I finally decided to start paying attention, my crimps were inconsistent. It was pretty obvious actually. So yes, I trim my 44 and 357 Mag brass. Brass <1.278 does not get trimmed. >/= 1.278 gets trimmed to 1.274". That seems to be plenty consistent. I completed trimming all my 44 Mag brass the winter before last. It was well worth the effort. I don't shoot a lot of 44 Mag, so I won't likely have to trim in the future. 357 may be a different story.

On a side note: 38/44 Special don't seem to need trimming. At least, not to me. Faster powders and taper crimping (about 90% of the time) seems to preclude trimming.
 
It was well worth the effort.
Click to expand...
(revolver/pistol) So your groups shrunk by how much after you trimmed the cases? No more tying up the revolver because an occasional bullet slipped it's crimp because of slight length inconsistency on heavy recoil? Your Extreme Spreads over the chronograph were cut in half? Ie. How was is 'well worth the effort'? Curious mind wants to know :) .
 
I bought my first 44 Mag (SBH) in 1974. I also bought a set of dies at the same time.

I've never shot any factory ammo out of any of them.

Since then, I have never trimmed. I developed a method of crimping that disregards different case lengths if there are any.

I have never had a gun locked up by a bullet moving under recoil. I have had only one fail to fire, and it fired on the second round, but was weak. That particular batch of ammo was loaded in 1976 and shot in 2016.
 
(revolver/pistol) So your groups shrunk by how much after you trimmed the cases? No more tying up the revolver because an occasional bullet slipped it's crimp because of slight length inconsistency on heavy recoil? Your Extreme Spreads over the chronograph were cut in half? Ie. How was is 'well worth the effort'? Curious mind wants to know .
Click to expand...

None of that matters. As long as I am happier with what I see under magnification of my crimps, believing my ammo is as good or better than virgin commercial, it's all good. Do what works for you.
 
I've been shooting a .44 Mag since 1975 and I have never trimmed a case. As long as the crimp is still somewhere in the cannelure, I don't worry about it. Any inaccuracy with off-hand shooting is more likely due to me than caused by a case that should have been trimmed.

Are rifle cases trimmed primarily to conserve accuracy or to be certain the round will chamber?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top