VictorLouis
New member
OK, some of you frequent flyers here know that my preference leans toward DAO. I have always used the meaty part of the first pad of my index finger to work the trigger, even in SA guns.
In dry-practice with my new P9, I discovered that such placement causes the underside of the 1st knuckle to rub against the inside bottom of the trigger guard. Being plastic, I estimate that it is about 3x thicker than its steel cousin, with which I have no trouble. Well, when I transition to using the 1st joint of the finger, the problem is not present. As a bonus, I seem to have better control in keeping the sights on target through the length of the pull. So far, so good.
Today, I brought out my two larger framed pistols to try in this manner. They allow for repeat strikes, so you can dry-fire far more rapidly than having to re-set the slide each time with the Kahr. The problem is, I seem to be able to pull the trigger faster with my usual placement. And I can do it "stronger", judging by how many times I can fire before fatigue sets in. Yet, the "control" experieced using the joint is manifest with them also.
What do you folks thinks matters more: The speed of fire? Or, the arguable gain in target accuracy with the other method? Bear in mind, defensive shooting and compatability between the pistols are my concerns.
(Oh, and please spare me the diatribe against DAOs. I'm already aware that many of you feel that they are a less then "efficient" choice. )
In dry-practice with my new P9, I discovered that such placement causes the underside of the 1st knuckle to rub against the inside bottom of the trigger guard. Being plastic, I estimate that it is about 3x thicker than its steel cousin, with which I have no trouble. Well, when I transition to using the 1st joint of the finger, the problem is not present. As a bonus, I seem to have better control in keeping the sights on target through the length of the pull. So far, so good.
Today, I brought out my two larger framed pistols to try in this manner. They allow for repeat strikes, so you can dry-fire far more rapidly than having to re-set the slide each time with the Kahr. The problem is, I seem to be able to pull the trigger faster with my usual placement. And I can do it "stronger", judging by how many times I can fire before fatigue sets in. Yet, the "control" experieced using the joint is manifest with them also.
What do you folks thinks matters more: The speed of fire? Or, the arguable gain in target accuracy with the other method? Bear in mind, defensive shooting and compatability between the pistols are my concerns.
(Oh, and please spare me the diatribe against DAOs. I'm already aware that many of you feel that they are a less then "efficient" choice. )