If I were to transport a carbine, say a Ruger PC4, would this fit under the definition of a rifle? The California Penal Code says, "SHOTGUNS AND RIFLES
Nonconcealable firearms (rifles and shotguns) are not generally covered within the provisions of California Penal Code section 12025 and therefore are not required to be transported in a locked container. However, as with any firearm, nonconcealable firearms must be unloaded while they are being transported. A rifle or shotgun that is considered an assault weapon in California must be transported in accordance with Penal Code section 12026.1."
But would a PC9 fall into this category? It seems pretty clear that the Penal Code is rather broad in defining the reasons for transporting a firearm, but if I were road tripping somewhere, I would like to make sure it would be ok to transport a carbine outside of the case. Not that I would, but if it were tactically necessary for some reason, it'd be nice to know I wasn't breaking the law in doing so.
Nonconcealable firearms (rifles and shotguns) are not generally covered within the provisions of California Penal Code section 12025 and therefore are not required to be transported in a locked container. However, as with any firearm, nonconcealable firearms must be unloaded while they are being transported. A rifle or shotgun that is considered an assault weapon in California must be transported in accordance with Penal Code section 12026.1."
But would a PC9 fall into this category? It seems pretty clear that the Penal Code is rather broad in defining the reasons for transporting a firearm, but if I were road tripping somewhere, I would like to make sure it would be ok to transport a carbine outside of the case. Not that I would, but if it were tactically necessary for some reason, it'd be nice to know I wasn't breaking the law in doing so.