Looking at the thread on the 1911 training video it came back to me that in those days they were always one handed...more instinctive, no sights?
I really do wonder why. It doesn't seem possible, by that time, that know one found out that a two handed combat stance like the Weaver or Isoceles might be a lot more stable.
I should do more practicing one handed, no sights, purely instinctive....which I would probably do in a crises situation anyway
I really do wonder why. It doesn't seem possible, by that time, that know one found out that a two handed combat stance like the Weaver or Isoceles might be a lot more stable.
I should do more practicing one handed, no sights, purely instinctive....which I would probably do in a crises situation anyway