The worst thing was when O'Reilly rushed to point out that the gun owners were "compensated." Bull! No one was compensated. If the government took away your car and gave you a pack of typing paper in return, that'd be the same thing as giving money for confiscated firearms--sure, they gave them money, but the money CAN'T TAKE THE PLACE OF THE FIREARM! Why can't they get this through their heads?
If I take something irreplaceable from you and give you something kinda nice in return, but nothing that can take the place of your loss, then how the hell do I get the arrogance to claim that I've compensated you?