Time magazine poll on Hillary Clinton!

Hil is gonna be ready to rock 'n roll when when she is the next Prez! Maybe she can find another Butch Reno to carry out the Patriot Act that Geo an' the Neo-Cons put in place. The defacation has to hit the oscillation sometime! Lock and load.
 
It'll all come down to how much the corporate media wants her to win. The law says each candidate has to get equal time on tv, but if Dan Rather spends 5 minutes on how great Hitlery is, he'll also spend 5 minutes on her opponent....on how bad he/she is. Remember 2004? Bush's cowardice in the National Guard was downplayed to the trumpeting of Kerry's cowardice and phoney purple heart in Vietnam, though both technically got equal airtime. The mainstream media is too chickens##t to go against it's sugardaddy. Even PBS, which is supposed to serve ALL the people, serves it's biggest contributors. Money talks, bulls**t walks.
 
Little Hitlary carpetbagger...became a New Yorker of convenience

Really....if she could not manage her husband.....how can she manage our country??? just a thought...semper fi..
 
If she runs she'll win. Who would the Repubs run against her? Some East Coast Establishment white male? Guilliani? They'll never get Rice to run and she's the only one that could beat the Hildabeest. She's also the only one not, quite, as much a screaching leftist as Hillary herself. Otherwise, really, a gun-grabbing lefty is the same regardless of sex or party label, right?

Hold the House and Senate, boys and girls. It's the best shot we have at not living the next 8 to 12 years in a tax-jacking, gun-grabbing, leftist social-engineering project from hell.
 
I actually think that Hillary would be a pretty good gift to the Republican party. Not as good as a Dean (or Kerry) but one shouldn't expect the other side to be too stupid. From the republican point of view some conservative democrat would be much more dangerous. Imagine a union-supporting, socially conservative, pro-life, pro-gun democrat. Probably many republicans would vote for him rather than a Giuliani. Unfortunately for them the democratic party leadership has isolated these type of conservative democrats and it is unlikely that one would get the nomination.

Unfortunately, the republican party doesn't have a lot of good and electable candidates IMHO. McCain may be their best shot but certainly the McCain-Feingold wasn't his finest hour...
 
McCain? Like I said, a leftist gun-grabber is a leftist gun-grabber, regardless of sex or party label. If the Repubs can't come up with something better then it really doesn't matter who wins as POTUS, we lose.
 
McCain may be their best shot but certainly the McCain-Feingold wasn't his finest hour...
Click to expand...

Actually, according to every poll I've seen, Rudi is the best shot by far to beat out Hillary. A big reason is the fact that he would carry all the electoral votes from NY along with the normal red states from previous elections. McCain is shown as only a 2-3 point favorite over Hillary while Rudi runs away with it by 10.
 
Giuliani will be the Republican they run - I wouldn't be surprised to see McCain throw a tantrum and run as an independent. I'll happily toss my vote to either the Libertarians or the Constitution party if McCain, Giuliani or Clinton is on the ballot. Doesn't matter which one of those three win - we lose. Bush is busy doing all he can to pave the road for something other than a Republican to get elected in '08 - IMHO he's an embarrassment to the Republican party.
 
To remark...

I think the two big politcal parties are both huge problems, it doesn't allow much room for real progress because it's all a show of one upmanship and if an indepdendent or third party tries to run, it fails because the other two parties pound them to death, so much for equal air time right? As for current situations, I have a bad feeling like SHTF bad, either at this point or some time later on down the road... I don't know if it's even worth voting any more, because it's good to know my vote doesn't count, and that when I vote for someone I believe in chances, are they aren't in the popularity contest. Just look at the bills being pushed day by day.


Epyon
 
'Bout a year ago I opined to a few compatriots that the next race would be Hillary vs Jeb Bush. Haven't seen anything to change my mind. And neither gives me a good feeling... But then Dubyah didn't either.
 
"Hil is gonna be ready to rock 'n roll when when she is the next Prez! Maybe she can find another Butch Reno to carry out the Patriot Act that Geo an' the Neo-Cons put in place. The defacation has to hit the oscillation sometime! Lock and load."

Do you call her "Hill" when you're over at the house planning the campaign? Does everybody call her Hill or only her close friends? I feel so out of touch with the Democratic insiders. ;)

John
 
If she runs she'll win. Who would the Repubs run against her? Some East Coast Establishment white male? Guilliani?
Click to expand...

Ummm.. I don't think so.

It's a simple fact that there are more registered Republicans than Democrats in the US, and that there are WAY more Conservatives than Liberals as well.

If Hillary ran, she would activate the Conservative base like wildfire.
And if Hillary ran against a Republican nominee of Mickey Mouse, our next president would be addressed as "President Mouse".

Hillary would be such an explosive candidate who would ignite such anti-Hillary backlash that you would think that Bush could have run again and won as a write-in candidate.

Carter
 
The same "vocal minority" that opted for Lamont over Liberman, for the most part, has no love for Hilary Clinton, either.

Most Democrats, and liberal-leaning people, I talk to tend to NOT want Clinton just as much as most of the Republicans, and conservative-leaning people, do.

It tends to make me wonder how we keep seeing so much pressure to have her run from everywhere when I have such a difficult time finding people who really seek to have her run for president. Truthfully, I think if Hilary Clinton runs it'll be a gift for the Republicans, especially if they can run a moderate, accepted canidate who's far from the useless mess of jackholes running our country now.

Hilary versus a McCain means that many of the Democrats will vote for McCain over the Clinton.
 
I'm more of a Centrist and I'll happily through my vote Republican anyday, even if it were the Prince of Darkness because at least he'll let me have my fun with guns and sex and violent video games. Hillary is a crazy biotch who likes to control people.
 
gfen, so we get a leftist loon with a Repub label instead of a leftist loon with a Dem label? I'm not trying to belabor the point but I have got to say it again: A leftist gun-grabber is a leftist gun-grabber. If the Repubs don't find someone decent to run then Hillary might as well win because we and this nation are screwed either way. Guilliani, McCain, etc are no more acceptable than the Hildabeest herself.

Conservative Repubs are NOT going to come out to vote FOR these people and they are no motivation to vote AGAINST Hillary, either. The Repub party has got to offer something better or conservatives are going to just stay home or vote 3rd party. Even then the result is still the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top