Hello out there,
I’ve just registered, and am a rifle noob when it comes to anything above a .22. The first two decades of my life I spent hunting, plinking, skeet shooting, and just all ‘round seeing what I could hit, but mainly shotguns, handguns, and a .22 Remington semiauto. I hunted a lot, but only birds, squirrels, & rabbits. I’ve fired higher-powered rifles, lots of folks had ‘em, but never regularly and never hunted with one. And, bear in mind, “the first two decades of my life” was ‘way more decades ago than I’d like to think about, so, while I have done a fair amount of handgun shooting over the years, it’s been decades since I’ve been in the woods with a long arm (Wow! Interesting- my computer marks “longarm” as misspelled, and when I go to dictionary.com it’s not found, nor Is “long arm”, except like a pole, extension for reaching, or “long arm of the law”. Does anyone still use this term?).
Always wanted to hunt something bigger, then three Thanksgivings ago this Nov, out of the blue, I got two separate, hands-on sessions in field dressing a deer, plus several days of shooting all sorts of rifles, and now I find myself in Colorado (from my home state of Florida) for several months, all alone, meeting new folks that include a rather large percentage of shooters here, and that did it- I’m taking the plunge, and now trying to decide which rifle to buy. Whew! What a way to make a short story long!
This will be my “beginner’s hunting rifle”; therefore, I’ve been shopping around for something relatively inexpensive, yet not so much a piece of junk that you can’t get a group in a garbage can lid. For this initial rifle, I’ve decided on .30-06, being the most versatile, universally available, and least expensive all-round caliber, and a bolt action. Amazingly, I have been very pleasantly surprised to find that these days you can get a pretty good gun, brand new, and scope for under $700. I thought for sure I’d be buying a used gun, but there's a brand new one in my immediate future. I do wish I could get something that I could swap between the scope & iron sights, though- it’s just so retro & nostalgic, ya’ know, but, apparently, not to be had in that price range.
So, I’m now down to the wire, and have been to several shops here in the CO Springs area, and, until last night, had narrowed my choices to a Tikka, Savage, or Remington. After cruising the forums and reviews, I’ve dropped the Remington. A lot of the reviews are mixed, and, while it appears that people who actually own and use ‘em are pretty happy with them, for this first rifle I’m not taking a chance.
The dilemma now is that the reviews for the Savage and Tikka are universally outstanding- haven’t seen one bad one, which makes my choice hard. I DO NOT want to start some religious battle here between the Tikkites and Savagites, but would appreciate any insight anyone has regarding some discriminator between these two rifles, particularly from anyone who owns or has extensively used both of these guns. Needless to say, I’m probably talking the bottom of the line models here, given the price, but I can’t believe the reviews on both the rifles are so universally good.
Both rifles are in the high-400s price range, but the Savage comes with a scope (forgot to note the make and model), the Tikka doesn’t. I’m too much a noob to evaluate the scope quality, other than to just plug it into Google, but at the price, it can’t be some super top-of-the-line model. I’ve dry-fired both, and like the trigger & bolt action on both, and I’m willing to dump the money into a scope for the Tikka if I decide on that one. Actually, a salesman, a really nice guy who seemed very knowledgeable, showed me both, and kind of sold me on the Tikka. They’re essentially the same price (within my rounding error), except for the included scope on the Savage.
And, here are a few specific questions:
I’ve just registered, and am a rifle noob when it comes to anything above a .22. The first two decades of my life I spent hunting, plinking, skeet shooting, and just all ‘round seeing what I could hit, but mainly shotguns, handguns, and a .22 Remington semiauto. I hunted a lot, but only birds, squirrels, & rabbits. I’ve fired higher-powered rifles, lots of folks had ‘em, but never regularly and never hunted with one. And, bear in mind, “the first two decades of my life” was ‘way more decades ago than I’d like to think about, so, while I have done a fair amount of handgun shooting over the years, it’s been decades since I’ve been in the woods with a long arm (Wow! Interesting- my computer marks “longarm” as misspelled, and when I go to dictionary.com it’s not found, nor Is “long arm”, except like a pole, extension for reaching, or “long arm of the law”. Does anyone still use this term?).
Always wanted to hunt something bigger, then three Thanksgivings ago this Nov, out of the blue, I got two separate, hands-on sessions in field dressing a deer, plus several days of shooting all sorts of rifles, and now I find myself in Colorado (from my home state of Florida) for several months, all alone, meeting new folks that include a rather large percentage of shooters here, and that did it- I’m taking the plunge, and now trying to decide which rifle to buy. Whew! What a way to make a short story long!
This will be my “beginner’s hunting rifle”; therefore, I’ve been shopping around for something relatively inexpensive, yet not so much a piece of junk that you can’t get a group in a garbage can lid. For this initial rifle, I’ve decided on .30-06, being the most versatile, universally available, and least expensive all-round caliber, and a bolt action. Amazingly, I have been very pleasantly surprised to find that these days you can get a pretty good gun, brand new, and scope for under $700. I thought for sure I’d be buying a used gun, but there's a brand new one in my immediate future. I do wish I could get something that I could swap between the scope & iron sights, though- it’s just so retro & nostalgic, ya’ know, but, apparently, not to be had in that price range.
So, I’m now down to the wire, and have been to several shops here in the CO Springs area, and, until last night, had narrowed my choices to a Tikka, Savage, or Remington. After cruising the forums and reviews, I’ve dropped the Remington. A lot of the reviews are mixed, and, while it appears that people who actually own and use ‘em are pretty happy with them, for this first rifle I’m not taking a chance.
The dilemma now is that the reviews for the Savage and Tikka are universally outstanding- haven’t seen one bad one, which makes my choice hard. I DO NOT want to start some religious battle here between the Tikkites and Savagites, but would appreciate any insight anyone has regarding some discriminator between these two rifles, particularly from anyone who owns or has extensively used both of these guns. Needless to say, I’m probably talking the bottom of the line models here, given the price, but I can’t believe the reviews on both the rifles are so universally good.
Both rifles are in the high-400s price range, but the Savage comes with a scope (forgot to note the make and model), the Tikka doesn’t. I’m too much a noob to evaluate the scope quality, other than to just plug it into Google, but at the price, it can’t be some super top-of-the-line model. I’ve dry-fired both, and like the trigger & bolt action on both, and I’m willing to dump the money into a scope for the Tikka if I decide on that one. Actually, a salesman, a really nice guy who seemed very knowledgeable, showed me both, and kind of sold me on the Tikka. They’re essentially the same price (within my rounding error), except for the included scope on the Savage.
And, here are a few specific questions:
- One thing I did see on a forum or review was some reference to the scope rings on the Tikka- something about they weren’t universal, or would only take certain scopes, or something like that. Ring a bell with anyone? What’s up with that?
- I’m left-handed. Don’t supposed there’s even a chance of a left-handed bolt action in that price range?
- Why don’t they make after-market magazines for these rifles (the Tikka in particular)? One complaint I’ve seen for the Tikka is the plastic magazine. That doesn’t really bother me in the least, since I saw no postings by anyone who had actually had the magazine break or wear out, but it’d be nice to get a magazine with a higher capacity, say 10 rounds, for the range, and a spare 4 or 5 shot to take into the woods. You can get after-market mags for practically all the semiauto handguns I own; why are they so rare for rifles?
- Any recommendations on factory ammo? High accuracy (and presumably more expensive) vs. shoot 'em up volume ammo for the range?
- Scope recommendations in the $150-$300 range?