Armed to the Teeth, and Free
The Wall Street Journal Europe
June 4, 1999
Stephen P. Halbrook
In 1994, when the U.S. Congress debated whether to ban "assault
weapons," a talk show host asked then-Senator Bill Bradley (New Jersey),
a sponsor of the ban, whether guns cause crime. The host noted that, in
Switzerland, all males are issued assault rifles for militia service and
keep them at home, yet little crime exists there. Sen. Bradley responded
that the Swiss "are pretty dull."
For those who think that target shooting is more fun than golf, however,
Switzerland is anything but "dull." By car or train, you see shooting
ranges everywhere, but few golf courses. If there is a Schuetzenfest
(shooting festival) in town, you will find rifles slung on hat racks in
restaurants, and you will encounter men and women, old and young,
walking, biking and taking the tram with rifles over their shoulders, to
and from the range. They stroll right past the police station and no one
bats an eye. (Try this in the U.S., and a SWAT Team might do you in.)
Tourists--especially those from Japan, where guns are banned to all but
the police--think it's a revolution. But shooting is the national sport,
and the backbone of the national defense as well. More per capita
firepower exists in Switzerland than in any other place in the world,
yet it is one of the safest places to be.
According to the U.N. International Study on Firearm Regulation,
England's 1994 homicide rate was 1.4 (9% involving firearms), and the
robbery rate 116, per 100,000 population. In the United States, the
homicide rate was 9.0 (70% involving firearms), and the robbery rate
234, per 100,000. England has strict gun control laws, ergo, the
homicide rate is lower than in the U.S. However, such comparisons can be
dangerous: In 1900, when England had no gun controls, the homicide rate
was only 1.0 per 100,000.
Moreover, using data through 1996, the U.S. Department of Justice study
"Crime and Justice" concluded that in England the robbery rate was 1.4
times higher, the assault rate was 2.3 times higher, and the burglary
rate was 1.7 times higher than in the U.S. This suggests that lawfully
armed citizens in the U.S. deter such crimes. Only the murder and rape
rates in the U.S. were higher than in England. The small number of
violent predators who commit most of these crimes in the U.S. have
little trouble arming themselves unlawfully.
The U.N. study omits mention of Switzerland, which is awash in guns and
has substantially lower murder and robbery rates
than England, where most guns are banned.
Here are the figures: The Swiss Federal Police Office reports that in
1997 there were 87 intentional homicides and 102 attempted homicides in
the entire country. Some 91 of these 189 murders and attempts involved
firearms. With its population of seven million (including 1.2 million
foreigners), Switzerland had a homicide rate of 1.2 per 100,000. There
were 2,498 robberies (and attempted robberies), of which 546 involved
firearms, resulting in a robbery rate of 36 per 100,000. Almost half of
these crimes were committed by non-resident foreigners, whom locals call
"criminal tourists."
Sometimes, the data sound too good to be true. In 1993, not a single
armed robbery was reported in Geneva.
No one seems to be looking at the Swiss example in the U.S., however.
Congress is stampeding to pass additional firearm
restrictions in response to the events of April 20, when two students
used guns and bombs to murder a dozen classmates
and a teacher in Littleton, Colorado. Yet in 1996, a man who legally
owned guns under England's strict regulations went
on a rampage, murdering 16 children and a teacher in Dunblane, Scotland.
Parliament then banned all handguns and most rifles.
But there have been no school massacres in Switzerland, where guns and
kids mix freely. At shooting matches, bicycles aplenty are parked
outside. Inside the firing shelter, the competitors pay 12-year-olds
tips to keep score. The 16-year-olds shoot rifles with men and women of
all ages. In fact, the tourist brochure "Zurich News" recommends
September's Knabenschiessen (boy's shooting contest) as a must-see: "The
oldest Zurich tradition . . . consists of a shooting contest at the
Albisguetli (range) for 12 to 16 year-old boys and girls and a colorful
three-day fun-fair." The event has been held since 1657, and attracts
thousands of teenage participants and spectators.
While many shoot for sport, all males aged 20 to 42 are required by
militia system regulation to keep rifles and/or pistols at home. In
addition, gun shops abound. Yet firearms are rarely used in crime.
Homicide is tied to a willingness to resort to violence, not the mere
presence of guns. The prevalence of firearms in the home and the
participation of youth in shooting matches bind youth to adults and
discourages a generation gap.
By contrast, homicide rates are highest in the underdeveloped countries,
many of which ban private firearm possession. In some, private murder
does not compare to the genocidal murder committed by governments
against their unarmed subjects.
In America, firearms take on a sinister reputation from the nightly news
and violent movies. But in Switzerland, firearms symbolize a wholesome,
community activity. The typical weekend shooting festival brings out the
entire family. Beside the range is a huge tent where scores or hundreds
of people are eating, drinking, and socializing. With cantonal and rifle
club banners fluttering in the wind, the melody of rifle fire blends
with Alpine music and cow bells.
Since its founding in 1291, Switzerland has depended on an armed
populace for its defense. William Tell used a crossbow
not only to shoot the apple from his son's head, but also to kill the
tyrant Gessler. For centuries, the cantonal republic defeated the
powerful armies of the European monarchs. Machiavelli wrote in 1532:
"The Swiss are well armed and enjoy great freedom."
This coincidence has not escaped the notice of those who oppose liberty.
Monarchist philosopher Jean Bodin, writing in 1606, denounced free
speech and arms possession by commoners. Subjects must be disarmed to
prevent democratic sedition, he said. The Swiss proved, Bodin wrongly
averred, that arms bearing was "the cause of an infinite number of
murders."
The Swiss militia model, however, preserved democracy and held Europe's
despots at bay. In fact, it inspired the rebellious American colonists.
John Adams praised the democratic Swiss Cantons, where every man was
entitled to vote on laws and to bear arms. Patrick Henry, another
American Founding Father, lauded the Swiss for maintaining their
independence without "a mighty and splendid President" or a standing
army.
The Swiss influence is clear in the Second Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, which provides: "A well regulated militia, being necessary
to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and
bear arms, shall not be infringed." Today, it has become fashionable to
hate this orphan of the Bill of Rights.
However, a quick glance at history shows that tyrannical governments
kill far more than do private criminals. But first, governments must
disarm their victims. In 1933, the Nazis seized power via massive
search-and-seizure operations for firearms against "Communists," i.e.,
all political opponents. In 1938, during the Night of the Broken Glass,
they disarmed the Jews. When the Nazis occupied Europe in 1939-41, they
proclaimed the death penalty for any person who failed to surrender all
firearms within 24 hours.
There may be various reasons why the Nazis did not invade Switzerland,
but one of those reasons is that every Swiss man had a rifle at home.
For this we have no better record than the Nazi invasion plans, which
stated that, because of the Swiss shooting skills, Switzerland would be
difficult to conquer and pacify. European countries occupied by the
Nazis had strict gun controls before the war, and the registration lists
facilitated confiscation of firearms and the execution of their owners.
By being able to keep out of both world wars in part through the
dissuasive factor of an armed populace, Switzerland demonstrates that
civilian firearm possession may prevent large numbers of deaths and even
genocide. The Holocaust never came to Switzerland, the Jewish population
of which was armed just like their fellow citizens. In the rest of
Europe, what if there had been not just one, but two, three, or many
Warsaw Ghetto Uprisings?
Traditionally, the Swiss Cantons had few firearm regulations. The first
federal firearms law was recently enacted. Certain firearm purchases
require a permit, and others do not. On retirement, every soldier may
keep his rifle or pistol. Surplus assault rifles may be purchased by any
Swiss citizen from the Military Department.
The bottom line is one of attitude. Populations with training in civic
virtue, though armed, do not experience sensational massacres or high
crime rates. Indeed, armed citizens deter crime. Switzerland fits this
mold. Similarly, America's lawful "gun culture" is peaceful. Sadly, some
of its subcultures are not.
--From The Wall Street Journal Europe
The Wall Street Journal Europe
June 4, 1999
Stephen P. Halbrook
In 1994, when the U.S. Congress debated whether to ban "assault
weapons," a talk show host asked then-Senator Bill Bradley (New Jersey),
a sponsor of the ban, whether guns cause crime. The host noted that, in
Switzerland, all males are issued assault rifles for militia service and
keep them at home, yet little crime exists there. Sen. Bradley responded
that the Swiss "are pretty dull."
For those who think that target shooting is more fun than golf, however,
Switzerland is anything but "dull." By car or train, you see shooting
ranges everywhere, but few golf courses. If there is a Schuetzenfest
(shooting festival) in town, you will find rifles slung on hat racks in
restaurants, and you will encounter men and women, old and young,
walking, biking and taking the tram with rifles over their shoulders, to
and from the range. They stroll right past the police station and no one
bats an eye. (Try this in the U.S., and a SWAT Team might do you in.)
Tourists--especially those from Japan, where guns are banned to all but
the police--think it's a revolution. But shooting is the national sport,
and the backbone of the national defense as well. More per capita
firepower exists in Switzerland than in any other place in the world,
yet it is one of the safest places to be.
According to the U.N. International Study on Firearm Regulation,
England's 1994 homicide rate was 1.4 (9% involving firearms), and the
robbery rate 116, per 100,000 population. In the United States, the
homicide rate was 9.0 (70% involving firearms), and the robbery rate
234, per 100,000. England has strict gun control laws, ergo, the
homicide rate is lower than in the U.S. However, such comparisons can be
dangerous: In 1900, when England had no gun controls, the homicide rate
was only 1.0 per 100,000.
Moreover, using data through 1996, the U.S. Department of Justice study
"Crime and Justice" concluded that in England the robbery rate was 1.4
times higher, the assault rate was 2.3 times higher, and the burglary
rate was 1.7 times higher than in the U.S. This suggests that lawfully
armed citizens in the U.S. deter such crimes. Only the murder and rape
rates in the U.S. were higher than in England. The small number of
violent predators who commit most of these crimes in the U.S. have
little trouble arming themselves unlawfully.
The U.N. study omits mention of Switzerland, which is awash in guns and
has substantially lower murder and robbery rates
than England, where most guns are banned.
Here are the figures: The Swiss Federal Police Office reports that in
1997 there were 87 intentional homicides and 102 attempted homicides in
the entire country. Some 91 of these 189 murders and attempts involved
firearms. With its population of seven million (including 1.2 million
foreigners), Switzerland had a homicide rate of 1.2 per 100,000. There
were 2,498 robberies (and attempted robberies), of which 546 involved
firearms, resulting in a robbery rate of 36 per 100,000. Almost half of
these crimes were committed by non-resident foreigners, whom locals call
"criminal tourists."
Sometimes, the data sound too good to be true. In 1993, not a single
armed robbery was reported in Geneva.
No one seems to be looking at the Swiss example in the U.S., however.
Congress is stampeding to pass additional firearm
restrictions in response to the events of April 20, when two students
used guns and bombs to murder a dozen classmates
and a teacher in Littleton, Colorado. Yet in 1996, a man who legally
owned guns under England's strict regulations went
on a rampage, murdering 16 children and a teacher in Dunblane, Scotland.
Parliament then banned all handguns and most rifles.
But there have been no school massacres in Switzerland, where guns and
kids mix freely. At shooting matches, bicycles aplenty are parked
outside. Inside the firing shelter, the competitors pay 12-year-olds
tips to keep score. The 16-year-olds shoot rifles with men and women of
all ages. In fact, the tourist brochure "Zurich News" recommends
September's Knabenschiessen (boy's shooting contest) as a must-see: "The
oldest Zurich tradition . . . consists of a shooting contest at the
Albisguetli (range) for 12 to 16 year-old boys and girls and a colorful
three-day fun-fair." The event has been held since 1657, and attracts
thousands of teenage participants and spectators.
While many shoot for sport, all males aged 20 to 42 are required by
militia system regulation to keep rifles and/or pistols at home. In
addition, gun shops abound. Yet firearms are rarely used in crime.
Homicide is tied to a willingness to resort to violence, not the mere
presence of guns. The prevalence of firearms in the home and the
participation of youth in shooting matches bind youth to adults and
discourages a generation gap.
By contrast, homicide rates are highest in the underdeveloped countries,
many of which ban private firearm possession. In some, private murder
does not compare to the genocidal murder committed by governments
against their unarmed subjects.
In America, firearms take on a sinister reputation from the nightly news
and violent movies. But in Switzerland, firearms symbolize a wholesome,
community activity. The typical weekend shooting festival brings out the
entire family. Beside the range is a huge tent where scores or hundreds
of people are eating, drinking, and socializing. With cantonal and rifle
club banners fluttering in the wind, the melody of rifle fire blends
with Alpine music and cow bells.
Since its founding in 1291, Switzerland has depended on an armed
populace for its defense. William Tell used a crossbow
not only to shoot the apple from his son's head, but also to kill the
tyrant Gessler. For centuries, the cantonal republic defeated the
powerful armies of the European monarchs. Machiavelli wrote in 1532:
"The Swiss are well armed and enjoy great freedom."
This coincidence has not escaped the notice of those who oppose liberty.
Monarchist philosopher Jean Bodin, writing in 1606, denounced free
speech and arms possession by commoners. Subjects must be disarmed to
prevent democratic sedition, he said. The Swiss proved, Bodin wrongly
averred, that arms bearing was "the cause of an infinite number of
murders."
The Swiss militia model, however, preserved democracy and held Europe's
despots at bay. In fact, it inspired the rebellious American colonists.
John Adams praised the democratic Swiss Cantons, where every man was
entitled to vote on laws and to bear arms. Patrick Henry, another
American Founding Father, lauded the Swiss for maintaining their
independence without "a mighty and splendid President" or a standing
army.
The Swiss influence is clear in the Second Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, which provides: "A well regulated militia, being necessary
to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and
bear arms, shall not be infringed." Today, it has become fashionable to
hate this orphan of the Bill of Rights.
However, a quick glance at history shows that tyrannical governments
kill far more than do private criminals. But first, governments must
disarm their victims. In 1933, the Nazis seized power via massive
search-and-seizure operations for firearms against "Communists," i.e.,
all political opponents. In 1938, during the Night of the Broken Glass,
they disarmed the Jews. When the Nazis occupied Europe in 1939-41, they
proclaimed the death penalty for any person who failed to surrender all
firearms within 24 hours.
There may be various reasons why the Nazis did not invade Switzerland,
but one of those reasons is that every Swiss man had a rifle at home.
For this we have no better record than the Nazi invasion plans, which
stated that, because of the Swiss shooting skills, Switzerland would be
difficult to conquer and pacify. European countries occupied by the
Nazis had strict gun controls before the war, and the registration lists
facilitated confiscation of firearms and the execution of their owners.
By being able to keep out of both world wars in part through the
dissuasive factor of an armed populace, Switzerland demonstrates that
civilian firearm possession may prevent large numbers of deaths and even
genocide. The Holocaust never came to Switzerland, the Jewish population
of which was armed just like their fellow citizens. In the rest of
Europe, what if there had been not just one, but two, three, or many
Warsaw Ghetto Uprisings?
Traditionally, the Swiss Cantons had few firearm regulations. The first
federal firearms law was recently enacted. Certain firearm purchases
require a permit, and others do not. On retirement, every soldier may
keep his rifle or pistol. Surplus assault rifles may be purchased by any
Swiss citizen from the Military Department.
The bottom line is one of attitude. Populations with training in civic
virtue, though armed, do not experience sensational massacres or high
crime rates. Indeed, armed citizens deter crime. Switzerland fits this
mold. Similarly, America's lawful "gun culture" is peaceful. Sadly, some
of its subcultures are not.
--From The Wall Street Journal Europe
