The antis are on a course that is enraging a lot of armed people in this country... that's true if they are right or wrong. It seem that one of two things is true:
1) The armed people in this country really are dangerous, and they're angering us in an attempt to commit suicide.
OR
2) They feel safe angering us because we really aren't a danger. If we're not a danger then why put restrictions on us?
Am I missing something?
1) The armed people in this country really are dangerous, and they're angering us in an attempt to commit suicide.
OR
2) They feel safe angering us because we really aren't a danger. If we're not a danger then why put restrictions on us?
Am I missing something?