Thoughts on a MASS scale letter campaign.

Jim March

New member
This started on another thread: http://www.thefiringline.com:8080/forums/showthread.php?threadid=28184

Rather than pick up every topic there, let's talk about a major, coordinated letter writing effort in support of a crucial event. I think the most important will be getting the Fed Supremes to hear (or decide?) an RKBA case.

To me, the keys are:

1) What do we write about?

2) Who do we aim it at?

3) THE TIMING.

I think the ultimate use of this that could come up would be to petition the Fed Supreme court to hear a particular RKBA case in a given year. That avalanche of support would then, we can hope, affect to some degree how they view the eventual case, if the flood of mail was truly memorable :). That might be either US vs. Emerson, or the California Roberti-Roos case as early as next year if we're lucky. Bob Stewart's mess could come up perhaps as soon as two years, but that's unlikely...three is within the realm of possibility.

My original point is that while scholarship supporting both the "individual rights view" of the 2A and the 2A incorporation principle under the 14A is growing rapidly, the Supremes may not see it as "of urgent interest" to society at large. If dump trucks full of mail are lined up around the block, that could change :).

The concept seems safe enough at first glance, less risky and potentially more effective than a personal mass march on DC that could be infiltrated and sabotaged. With luck we could get BOTH the NRA and GOA behind it, and at that point most other orgs would probably fall in line.

Tricky bits: "who picks the timing?" is one...one answer that might satisfy everybody, if he likes the basic idea, is Stephen Hallbrook. Hallbrook is a key lawyer in Emerson, a good pro-RKBA attorney who's done some important scholarship. I don't think there's a single pro-RKBA person anywhere who doesn't respect the hell out of him. Clayton Cramer thinks the world of him, and he's got a lot of credibility his ownself.

We also have to answer the "could it possibly backfire?" question. I don't THINK so...but that needs more educated discussion. Maybe include the word "petition" somewhere in there...we have a direct constitutional "right to petition" that directly affected the Fed gov't under the original BoR and was expanded to the states under the 14A alterations.

Tell ya what. I've got some NRA contacts, real high up. It'll take a few days, lemme bounce this around and see what shakes. I'll point people right to this thread, feel free to add comments/questions especially if they don't involve bickering :). I just want to know what problems people foresee, any proposed tweaks, any shows of support, whatever. 'Kay?

IF this happens, all three key questions (who to write to, what basic types of things to say, when to write) will be answered in EMail/net broadcasts that'll go EVERYWHERE, distributed by every major and minor group imaginable. A real solidarity play, and God knows we could use it.

One thing: I don't think sending spent shells, bullets, shot-to-hell targets or similar are a good answer. I'm willing to be convinced but...I think "petition" is a whole 'nuther critter that needs to stay more polite.

Jim

[This message has been edited by Jim March (edited July 28, 2000).]
 
One of the purposes of the 2nd was to foster a well-regulated militia that is necessary for a free state. It is the people trained to arms from which a well-regulated militia is comprised...

Look at the shape of our militia today... The feds have ignored it. There are outright bans on arms in a few places. There are vast numbers of our militia who are not only being told not to keep and bear arms but are being denied the right to do so.... there are getting to be vast numbers of military weapons which are now outlawed and can not be purchased or used by the militia. How are they to be prepared? How are they going to not only know how to use those arms, but also to be well regulated in their use, when access to them is denied?

Our militia is in a sorry state. The defense of our country, lives and our freedoms is at stake here. And who's fault is it? Yes the SC.... by keeping silent, they are fostering the death of the militia.

The problem extends far beyond the violation of any one of our individual rights. By the SC not enforcing the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms they are killing the militia. How many members of our militia no longer have arms? How many do not even know how to load one, let alone know how to shoot one accurately?

As a result is our standing army any better or is it worse off? Where are the new recruits who come into the military with 10+ years of rifle practice under their belts…. Where are the new Sergeant York’s? (sp?)

Let there be no mistake… the security of this country can not be dependent upon technology alone… the soldier, well-regulated in the use of his arms, is as necessary today as he was at our founding…



------------------
Richard

The debate is not about guns,
but rather who has the ultimate power to rule,
the People or Government.
RKBA!
 
Richard, I don't disagree with the above one bit. However, check my post on this thread: http://www.thefiringline.com:8080/forums/showthread.php?threadid=28215

I think you're missing how the 2A got "extended" just after the civil war with a distinct "personal civil right" flavor.

In my opinion, that latter emphasis may carry more weight with the court. Both "layers" of the 2A must be discussed because only with the 2nd layer was the 2A applied to the states.

And most of the really bad gun control is state level, IMHO.

Jim
 
Jim; I have been thinking about what you said on the letter writing, I don`t think the SC should be considered at this time, to much could go wrong. They do not have to worry about getting relected.

Now I know that people like Dennis Hastert, Trent Lott, the ones in power, have to worry only about thier own states to get relected. But if they recived letters from 3or4 million people from all states, along with letters sent to all states Reps in Congress, maybe that is the way to go?

One thing comes to mind most. United we stand Divided we fall. This is as old as time itself, it won`t fail.

Just look at what the Socialists are doing, with the help of the media, NBC, CBS, ABC, PMSNBC, etc. They attack everything that gets in their way on the march to a NWO, and they are all in unasunce on their march, even in their deception of the truth, they stand together.Should we do no less than stand together, we don`t have to lie and distort the truth.If we all don`t stand as one, they will eventually win.

Look what all most happened to Orin Hatch,he almost lost his Throne, he sure got religion real quick, with any luck he will be Vanquished by a true Connstitunalist. It was because people united.

I don`t know how many groups would support a united effort, NRA, GOA, The Second Amendment Sisters, etc.But internal politics have to go to make this happen.

I know that some here are members of several different groups, as I am.This could be a small problem, but it can be overcome.
 
They don't HAVE to listen to outside pressure.

But they sure as hell can.

Look, let's assume that at a given time when all this goes down, at least four of the nine judges are at least trying to give a damn about doing a "good job for society". And at the beginning of the year's work, they've got this monster pile of potential cases to sort through and figure out "which ones are important".

Now, these older guys/gals have led pretty sheltered lives for a long time. They're not exactly up to date on the "pulse of the people". If they have to decide between, say, taking a welfare related case that they think is critical to a lot of people, and a long detailed technical RKBA case that they think is of interest mostly to historians...we have the right and duty to let 'em know that yes indeed, this is NOT some "obscure technical issue"...

Makes sense to me...

jim
 
Back
Top