Thought provoking maunderings

[Rob P.]

I was rereading the California Constitution when I realized something....

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SEC. 1. The State of California is an inseparable part of the
United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_3

Wouldn't this particular provision of the State Constitution mean:
1) The Federal constitutional restrictions on prohibiting the RKBA applies to California;
2) That the Federal Constitution controls ALL areas in relationship to citizens' rights;
3) That the Federal Constitution pre-empts State laws;
or any other iteration of the above precept?

I mean combining the above State Constitutional article with ARticle VI of the U.S. Constitution (supremacy clause) would indicate that the Fed Constitution certainly pre-empts State laws across the board.

So, (sanity check) does this mean what I believe it means?

 

[BIGJACK]

Don't understand why a good constitutional lawyer could not have declared, any state law that is contrary to the constitution of the US, repealed????
Why not check into it, I suspicion that the NRA already has, would be interested in knowing what their findings were? Anyone have that info???

 

[Gary Conner]

In Kalifornia, neither Constitution is of any importance to the California Supreme Court Justices and is simply disregarded. (Kind of like in Florida)

The reason is a Cosmic Vortex hovers over the courthouse beaming in thought directives from the Mother Planet Ziercon Perius 8, causing them to simply ignore both Federal Constitutional law, and State law. They just can't help it.

 

[Weeg]

In Kalifornia, neither Constitution is of any importance to the California Supreme Court Justices and is simply disregarded.

Sounds like the Kaliban is still in power in Kalifornistan

(Kind of like in Florida)

Florida???? They've got some of the most non-restrictive Gun Laws in the USA


??????????