This Just In......

Status
Not open for further replies.

DCougar

New member
If other people have read this already I apologize, but thought this would be something that needed immediate attention. Please read and fight for our rights. Thanks


The proposed law, House Bill 760, would require ALL firearms to be registered annually. The registration would cost $10 per gun each year.
Owners would have to provide two forms of photo identification and fingerprints.

On Wednesday, April 4, the Gun Registration Act of 2007 was introduced in the House. It was introduced by Representatives Angel Cruz (D-180), Rosita Youngblood (D-198), Cherelle Parker (D-200), Jake Wheatley (D-19), Lisa Bennington (D-21) and Lawrence Curry (D-154).

[…]

Under House Bill 760, all privately-owned firearms, with certain limited exceptions, would be subject to annual registration at a cost of $10 per firearm. This would include firearms owned privately by Pennsylvania law enforcement officers. In addition, the registration process would require two passport style photographs — taken within 30 days of the date of each application — and fingerprinting. The application form would require the applicant’s name, address - home and business - phone, birth date and social security number, as well as a description of each firearm. If the registration is denied, the firearms would be confiscated.

The legislation also requires the State Police to conduct a criminal background check and approve any firearm registration prior to the purchase of a firearm, in addition to the PICS/NICS check run by the State Police concurrent with each purchase.

Restrictions on possession of registered firearms would limit the use of firearms to the registrant’s “place of residence or business or while being used for lawful recreational purposes.” No definition of recreational purposes is written in the legislation.

You can file a petition @
http://www.reprohrer.com/?sectionid=73&sectiontree=73
 
-- What is scary is almost all of these new bills and so on have a clause saying how the "State Police" will have the final say. While we need police, we don't need a "Policed State". I often wonder what the set rules would be and exactly WHO would be making final decisions.
-- Sounds like yet another attempt to bypass normal legal systems, such as a Judge, and go straight for the throat.
 
K80>> I like your signature line--very appropriate to this thread :cool:

Lets see--how does that quote go again? "A well armed population is a free population..." Something to that regard. It's just another attempt to disarm the population--and in my own mind, ease the transition into full subjegation with the least amount of possible resistance. "We are the government. You will be incorporated into our collective. Resistance is futile." :D There's something to be learned from all the countries who have regulated firearms into extinction by the private citizen: It solves NOTHING.
 
Comments posted in the thread referenced by K80Geoff.

Note:
We have to register to vote but it's free because voting is a right. Rights may not be taxed or have a fee imposed for the exercise thereof (so sayeth SCOTUS). Owning a firearm is also a right, thus the mandatory $10 fee to comply with the law should be unconstitutional. Will they be so willing to require annual registration if they have to do it for free?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top