This is insane. Different animals

Wildcard

Moderator
Speed up process to fire bad cops

A Wisconsin State Journal editorial.
July 24, 2006
City taxpayers have been paying a suspended Madison police officer for nearly two years not to work.

That's way too long.

The city needs to speed its disciplinary process for police officers and firefighters who are formally accused of misconduct.

If that doesn't happen, the state should step in and limit how long taxpayers must hang on the hook.

Madison police officer Russell L. Henderson was suspended in September 2004 but has continued to collect his annual salary of about $58,000. His last assignment was as the educational resource officer at Memorial High School.

Henderson pleaded guilty in Dane County Court in January 2005 to disorderly conduct and making a telephone threat. About five months later, Madison Police Chief Noble Wray recommended Henderson be fired for unlawfulness and for lying to internal affairs investigators looking into a domestic abuse incident at his home.

That, in turn, triggered a slow, tedious review process by the city's Police and Fire Commission that continues today.

The commission plods along in part because its citizen members often have day jobs. That means the commission typically can meet only during the evenings and Saturdays.

The commission generously grants delays for just about any reason either attorney comes up with. And there's little incentive for an accused officer -- especially a guilty one -- to try to expedite a case. After all, if the officer loses, his or her pay check might go away.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled three years ago that Police and Fire Commissions can hire hearing examiners to handle difficult or large cases. That was supposed to shorten the time it takes to discipline or fire police officers and firefighters accused of wrongdoing.

But Police and Fire Commissions across Wisconsin have stubbornly ignored this option, preferring instead to slog along toward decisions on their own.

In the meantime, taxpayers have to shovel money to employees who don't work.

Given the difficult nature of their jobs, police officers and firefighters deserve some insulation against undo political pressure. They deserve a fair review before a chief can fire them.

But they don't deserve years of pay for sitting at home. Either fire Henderson or put him back to work in some capacity. If that's not possible, the state should allow the city to cut off his pay until a decision is finally made.

http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/opinion/index.php?ntid=92208&ntpid=1
 
You know, if the people on this "commitee" were paid instead of this guilty cop, they might be able to do their job as a review board full time instead of a couple of hours some nights.
 
Those are the rules. While this guy might be guilty, what about the cop that gets a bad rap and is innocent. If enough citizens dont like it then they should vote the people in the city who made the rules out and vote new ones in.

The only lingering question in my mind is if the evidence was so overwhelming and the Officer was so bad why havent they fired him. I dont know how many Police Officers there are in Madison but I cant imagine that they would have a backlog that was 2 years long at the board????? Or maybe the guys on the board are all pals with him????

Formally accused means that the officer has not been found guilty.

Same on the dometic abuse issue...has he been found guilty?

Did the police document stuff like they should have? I have seen a few arbitrations where agencies tried to railroad some folks. I have also seen cases where the documentation wasnt done by the agency and they got stuck with a dud.
 
wow..Ive heard of extended unenjoyment,disability ssi and even lottery payments but 2 years,not working and bringing in income while some committe out there is minding its p's and q's and cant come to a decision..in 2 whole years?


either he is or he isnt.time to get on with things.
 
He already plead guilty! It took five months after that for his termination to be recommended. How hard is this to understand?
 
Actually, he pled guilty and was apparently still employed. Then, there were allegations of domestic assault. After that, the chief recommended the officer be fired.
 
Back
Top