Is your primary goal (a) to have a carry gun that specifically must be a .32, or (b) to have a .32 that you might occasionally choose to carry when you get the inkling?
GregInAtl said:
I prefer to pocket carry...
Is a belt holster an option?
The reason I ask is that the options for a belt-holster Just-Cause-I-Wanna-Carry-It-Today gun are far more numerous than the pocket-carry-specific option, particularly if used guns are a possibility.
The selection of currently-offered pocket-able .32 pistols basically boils down to the P32, the NAA Guardian, some el-cheapo Zamak options that most folks on this forum are unlikely to recommend (myself included), the Beretta 3032 Tomcat
if you can find one (availability is notoriously spotty), and the Beretta Pico
if Beretta manages to positively solve the ejection problems that have plagued the Pico
and Beretta actually makes the long-promised .32 ACP factory barrel kit available, which AFAIK has not happened yet.
I don't like the Pico's ergonomics or reputation regardless of the .32 barrel availability issue, and I think the Tomcat borders upon not being strong enough for the caliber, so IMHO your only 2 reasonable choices are the NAA and the Kel-Tec. Of those 2, the Kel-Tec is smaller, much cheaper, and has a reputation for rock-solid reliability, making it my preference by a long shot (no pun intended). The NAA offers jewel-like quality and a smoother trigger, but this is not enough to overcome its larger size and higher price IMHO. I choose CCW guns according to how they work rather than how they look, as they'll eventually wind up looking ragged regardless of how nicely they start out.
Lastly, the crop of used .32 pocket-friendly pistols is pretty slim, as most historical centerfire "mouse guns" have been .25-caliber rather than .32-caliber.