these are the people in charge of our justice system?

Redworm

Moderator
:rolleyes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6foi-Jp55K0

On the right you'll see a whole set of those. Goodling goes on to not only refute Gonzales' own testimony - meaning either she's lying, he's lying, or they're both lying...I'm betting on door #3 - but she refuses to cooperate and pleading the 5th despite being given immunity.

In the end it seems no one created this list, it just magically appeared out of thin air. Either Gonzales is the corrupt bastard we all know he is or he's so wholly and completely incompetent that he has no idea what's going on under him. Either way his fan club of 1 is once again too thick-headed to recognize when he's made a gross mistake, this time the gross mistake was appointing this moron at the top cop.

And to think he almost nominated him for the court! :eek:
 
In the end it seems no one created this list, it just magically appeared out of thin air.

Have you seen the bit from The Daily Show a couple days ago on this? If not, you really ought to go check it out...he called it the "Immaculate Termination." All kinds of other good and hilarious stuff.

Also, if anybody's interested here's a complete transcript, since YouTube seems only to have bits and pieces, often strung together.
 
Thing is, most of the general public just doesn't care.

I know the libs are very passionate about the issue. But in general, most people just don't care that a couple of lawyers were fired.

After all, they are lawyers......;)
 
I know the libs are very passionate about the issue. But in general, most people just don't care that a couple of lawyers were fired.

I just can't figure out why the...cons, I guess it would be...aren't passionate about it as well. More and more it appears that laws were broken, and that now it's being covered up...to include misleading, incomplete, and/or blatantly false testimony to Congress.

I don't see how this is a "good" thing.
 
I just can't figure out why the...cons, I guess it would be...aren't passionate about it as well. More and more it appears that laws were broken, and that now it's being covered up...to include misleading, incomplete, and/or blatantly false testimony to Congress.

I don't see how this is a "good" thing.
Because lying to Congress is only a no-no when it's about blowjobs.
 
Well if it had been done right all they would have had to say is The President terminating their appointments which is within his rights to do so. Instead they chose to link it to job performance which was the first fib. Then we get a few more fibs about who knew what and when. A Democratic Congress catching them with e-mails that discount some of these stories.

Dont give folks a shovel to bury you with.
 
There's more, much more.
The Goods on Goodling and the Keys to the Kingdom
7 Comments Published May 24th, 2007 in Articles
Special to the BRADBLOG by Greg Palast

This Monica revealed something hotter — much hotter — than a stained blue dress. In her opening testimony yesterday before the House Judiciary Committee, Monica Goodling, the blonde-ling underling to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Department of Justice Liaison to the White House, dropped The Big One….And the Committee members didn’t even know it.

Goodling testified that Gonzales’ Chief of Staff, Kyle Sampson, perjured himself, lying to the committee in earlier testimony. The lie: Sampson denied Monica had told him about Tim Griffin’s “involvement in ‘caging’ voters” in 2004.

Huh?? Tim Griffin? “Caging”???

The perplexed committee members hadn’t a clue — and asked no substantive questions about it thereafter. Karl Rove is still smiling. If the members had gotten the clue, and asked the right questions, they would have found “the keys to the kingdom,” they thought they were looking for. They dangled right in front of their perplexed faces.

The keys: the missing emails — and missing link — that could send Griffin and his boss, Rove, to the slammer for a long, long time.

Kingdom enough for ya?

But what’s ‘caging’ and why is it such a dreadful secret that lawyer Sampson put his license to practice and his freedom on the line to cover Tim Griffin’s involvement in it? Because it’s a felony. And a big one.

Our BBC team broke the story at the top of the nightly news everywhere on the planet - except the USA - only because America’s news networks simply refused to cover this evidence of the electoral coup d’etat that chose our President in 2004.

Here’s how caging worked, and along with Griffin’s thoughtful emails themselves you’ll understand it all in no time.

The Bush-Cheney operatives sent hundreds of thousands of letters marked “Do not forward” to voters’ homes. Letters returned (”caged”) were used as evidence to block these voters’ right to cast a ballot on grounds they were registered at phony addresses. Who were the evil fakers? Homeless men, students on vacation and — you got to love this — American soldiers. Oh yeah: most of them are Black voters.

Why weren’t these African-American voters home when the Republican letters arrived? The homeless men were on park benches, the students were on vacation — and the soldiers were overseas. Go to Baghdad, lose your vote. Mission Accomplished.

How do I know? I have the caging lists…

I have them because they are attached to the emails Rove insists can’t be found. I have the emails. 500 of them — sent to our team at BBC after the Rove-bots accidentally sent them to a web domain owned by our friend John Wooden.

Here’s what you need to know — and the Committee would have discovered, if only they’d asked:

1. ‘Caging’ voters is a crime, a go-to-jail felony.
2. Griffin wasn’t “involved” in the caging, Ms. Goodling. Griffin, Rove’s right-hand man (right-hand claw), was directing the illegal purge and challenge campaign. How do I know? It’s in the email I got. Thanks. And it’s posted below.
3. On December 7, 2006, the ragin’, cagin’ Griffin was named, on Rove’s personal demand, US Attorney for Arkansas. Perpetrator became prosecutor.

The committee was perplexed about Monica’s panicked admission and accusations about the caging list because the US press never covered it. That’s because, as Griffin wrote to Goodling in yet another email (dated February 6 of this year, and also posted below), their caging operation only made the news on BBC London: busted open, Griffin bitched, by that “British reporter,” Greg Palast.

There’s no pride in this. Our BBC team broke the story at the top of the nightly news everywhere on the planet — except the USA — only because America’s news networks simply refused to cover this evidence of the electoral coup d’etat that chose our President in 2004.

And now, not bothering to understand the astonishing revelation in Goodling’s confessional, they are missing the real story behind the firing of the US attorneys. It’s not about removing prosecutors disloyal to Bush, it’s about replacing those who refused to aid the theft of the vote in 2004 with those prepared to burgle it again in 2008.

Now that they have the keys, let’s see if they can put them in the right door. The clock is ticking ladies and gents…

badbob
 
So may issues can be made to go away with "yeah, I did it...so what"...

So Mr president, did you catch a little oral fun with your intern?
Yeah I did it, so what?

So Mr. President, did you tell the AG to fire them US Attys
Yeah I did it, so what?

WildforgivenessiseasiertogetthanpermissionAlaska
 
So may issues can be made to go away with "yeah, I did it...so what"...

My point exactly. Well, sort of. :D

Most people, when asked about this terrible, horrible scandel uncovered by the Democrats, will respond with, "huh? Lawyers got fired? So what?"

(or, alternatively, you can substitute "So what" with "Excellent! The only good lawyer is a fired lawyer!") :D
 
but she [Goodling] refuses to cooperate and pleading the 5th despite being given immunity.
Is that possible? I thought once you're granted immunity, you can be subpoenaed and you either testify or you're in contempt.
 
Back
Top