The New World Disorder

Doug.38PR

Moderator
Interesting read

THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
N. American students
trained for 'merger'
10 universities participate in 'model Parliament' in Mexico to simulate 'integration' of 3 nations


Posted: September 25, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com


American University Professor Robert Pastor



WASHINGTON – In another example of the way the three nations of North America are being drawn into a federation, or "merger," students from 10 universities in the U.S., Mexico and Canada are participating annually in a simulated "model Parliament."
Under the sponsorship of the Canadian based North American Forum on Integration, students met in the Mexican Senate for five days in May in an event dubbed "Triumvirate," with organizers declaring "A North American Parliament is born."
A similar event took place in the Canadian Senate in 2005.
The intentions of organizers are clear.
"The creation of a North American parliament, such as the one being simulated by these young people, should be considered," explained Raymond Chretien, the president of the Triumvirate and the former Canadian ambassador to both Mexico and the U.S.

Participants discuss draft bills on trade corridors, immigration, provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement and produce a daily newspaper called "The TrilatHerald."

The 10 universities taking part include Harvard, American University, Carlton University, Simon Fraser, Universite de Montreal, Ecole nationale d'administration publique, Monterrey TEC, CIDE, Monterrey University and Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud.

Officials taking part have included James Williams, the former U.S. ambassador to Canada. The North American Forum on Integration says the annual event enjoys the support of the U.S. Embassy in Canada, the Canadian Embassy in Mexico and the North American Development Bank. It also has been supported by at least one U.S. news organization – the Houston Chronicle.

NAFI says it is "a non-profit organization devoted to developing North American dialogue and networks and at publicizing issues raised by North American integration."
The board of directors of NAFI include Robert A. Pastor, professor and director of the Center for North American Studies at American University and vice chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations Task Force on North America. He has testified before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on the idea of merging the United States, Mexico and Canada in a North American union stretching from Prudhoe Bay to Guatemala.
"What we need to do," Pastor instructed, "is forge a new North American Community. ... Instead of stopping North Americans on the borders, we ought to provide them with a secure, biometric border pass that would ease transit across the border like an E-Z pass permits our cars to speed through tolls."

Pastor is the author of "Toward a North American Community," a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.
As vice chairman of the May 2005 CFR task force, he is an architect of the Building a North American Community" plan that presents itself as a blueprint for using bureaucratic action within the executive branches of Mexico, the U.S. and Canada to transform the current trilateral Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America into a North American union regional government.
The CFR report is a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter." Some see it as the blueprint for merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. It calls for "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."
The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for efforts to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for efforts to "harmonize entry screening."

In "Building a North American Community," the report states that Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23, 2005, at that meeting in Waco, Texas.
Pastor believes the U.S. and Canadian government should divert significant new taxpayer funding to solving the problems of the poor in Mexico.

"If Canada and the United States contributed just 10 percent of what the European Union spends on aid for its poorest member, and if Mexico invested it wisely in infrastructure and education, then Mexico could begin to grow at twice the rate of its northern neighbors, and North America would have found the magic formula to lift developing countries to the level of the industrialized world," he said in 2002.

The next Triumvirate model parliament conference will be in the United States – in either New York or Washington, according to a spokeswoman for the North American Forum.

It's not just the mock "parliament" sessions involving students of the three countries that raises concerns among those suspicious about political and social "inertia" moving the U.S. into a European Union-style merger with its northern and southern neighbors.

Earlier this month, a high-level, top-secret meeting of the North American Forum took place in Banff, Canada – with topics ranging from "A Vision for North America," "Opportunities for Security Cooperation" and "Demographic and Social Dimensions of North American Integration."
Pastor was listed as a confirmed participant in that meeting, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former Secretary of State George Shultz, former Central Intelligence Agency Director R. James Woolsey, former Immigration and Naturalization Services Director Doris Meissner, former Defense Secretary William Perry, former Energy Secretary and Defense Secretary James Schlesinger and top officials of both Mexico and Canada.

Opposition is mounting to such meetings, policy papers and presidential directives leading to what some critics characterize as "NAFTA on steroids." The concerns began in earnest March 31, 2005, when the elected leaders of the U.S., Mexico and Canada agreed to advance the agenda of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

Perhaps the most blistering criticism came earlier this summer from Lou Dobbs of CNN – a frequent critic of President Bush's immigration policies.
"A regional prosperity and security program?" he asked rhetorically in a recent cablecast. "This is absolute ignorance. And the fact that we are – we reported this, we should point out, when it was signed. But, as we watch this thing progress, these working groups are continuing. They're intensifying. What in the world are these people thinking about? You know, I was asked the other day about whether or not I really thought the American people had the stomach to stand up and stop this nonsense, this direction from a group of elites, an absolute contravention of our law, of our Constitution, every national value. And I hope, I pray that I'm right when I said yes. But this is – I mean, this is beyond belief."

No one seems quite certain what that agenda is because of the vagueness of the official declarations. But among the things the leaders of the three countries agreed to work toward were borders that would allow for easier and faster moving of goods and people between the countries.
Coming as the announcement did in the midst of a raging national debate in the U.S. over borders seen as far to open already, more than a few jaws dropped.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo. and the chairman of the House Immigration Reform Caucus as well as author of the new book, "In Mortal Danger," may be the only elected official to challenge openly the plans for the new superstate.
Responding to a WND report, Tancredo is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of the government office implementing the trilateral agreement that has no authorization from Congress.
Tancredo wants to know the membership of the Security and Prosperity Partnership groups along with their various trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements reached with counterparts in Mexico and Canada.

Why the secrecy?

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."
The concerns about the direction such powerful men could lead Americans without their knowledge is only heightened when interlocking networks are discovered. For instance, one of the components envisioned for this future "North American Union" is a superhighway running from Mexico, through the U.S. and into Canada. It is being promoted by the North American SuperCorridor Coalition, or NASCO, a non-profit group "dedicated to developing the world’s first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America."

The president of NASCO is George Blackwood, who earlier launched the North American International Trade Corridor Partnership. In fact, NAITCP later morphed into NASCO. A NAITCP summit meeting in 2004, attended by senior Mexican government officials, heard from American University's Pastor.=
 
What round do I use in my revolver for the North American Union?

BTW, didn't we invade Canada and Mexico at different times? The Western Provinces of Canada sometimes have talked about joining the USA.

James Polk said that he should have taken more.

I'm going to take the aluminum foil off my tacos, wash them out and put it on my head.
 
Why do I think this is funny...(Thanks to rotten.com's library for keeping all the things we don't normally get to learn about alive)
http://www.trilateral.org/
http://www.rotten.com/library/conspiracy/new-world-order/
http://www.rotten.com/library/conspiracy/cabal/
http://www.rotten.com/library/conspiracy/cabal/report-from-davos/

And my favorite quote from rotten's trilateral entry:
" 11 Jun 1993 The Washington Times reports: "Presidential counsellor David Gergen resigned yesterday from the all-male Bohemian Club, three days after saying he would not run around naked at its annual Bohemian Grove encampment and insisting he would not quit. White House spokeswoman Dee Dee Myers announced the resignation along with Mr. Gergen's departure from 17 other interest groups, charities and public boards ranging from the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and Council on Foreign Relations."

If you can sit on 18 of probably the most important boards and commissions running this country, if not the world, you can run around nekkid in a bohemian grove with the rest of the club members. No one likes a prune...
 
as a Houstonian, the Houston Chronicle (now our one and only paper...that about 50% of the people here don't subscribe to anymore, myself included) is one of the biggest liberal rags out there. Doesn't surprise me they support this.

Heck with Congress. It's up to our governors and state legislatures to do what is necessary to nip this in the bud.

What round do I use in my revolver for the North American Union?

BTW, didn't we invade Canada and Mexico at different times? The Western Provinces of Canada sometimes have talked about joining the USA.

James Polk said that he should have taken more.

You use a .22 lr revolver. that should do the job.

Two different contexts. Yes we did invade Canada during the first American War for Independence, yes Polk (as a Jacksonian like Houston) and some others did want more. Even early Jefforsonians wanted the Western Hemisphere as an "Empire of liberty."
But what they were talking about then, and what these marxist bozos in said article (and Dubya and his neocon allies) want are two different things.

In 1700s and 1800s, said lands were to a large extent (especially 1700s) unpopulated and unsettled were thought to be "americanized" as Texas was AND that they would be free confederacies and at the most would be part of the Union of States (not a great centralized Empire) of people with a common culture and background.

Much of it was motivated to keep European nations like Spain and England out (Monroe Doctrine)

Then there was the North/South political conflict in antebellum times. Some Southern Statesman felt the ruling class of countries like Mexico (with their peonage system similar to the slave system and more agrarian economy) would be sympathetic with Southern efforts to combat radical industrial North and their weapon of radical abolitionism. Hence new states that would be entered into the union would be "slave" states and would be able to block Northern legislation against Southern interests.

There reasons then were understandable, but even back then, statesman like John C. Calhoun of South Carolinia (prophet that he was) warned against moving into other countries like Mexico and trying to annex them into the United States. Believed we should leave them to their problems (internal revolutions, racial and class problems) and let us solve our own and work towards being good neighbors. He believed that such efforts, like the Iraq or Vietnam situation, would lead to our having to constantly use the military (at the cost of American lives) to preserve governments in those countries and keep order.

The Founding Fathers and their offspring would have fallen out of their chairs at such an idea as proposed quoted in this article and in modern conditions.
 
I'm not going to worry, Doug - you will be there to defend us against guys in funny uniforms.

What round do you use in your revolver for a Marxist Bozo? Personally, I'm scared of Bozo. On Supernatural tonight, the brothers will take on killer Bozos. Unfortunately, they don't have the magic revolver anymore.

I want the tinfoil hat smilie added to our set!!
 
Would'nt it be funny...

If other students in response to the 'simulated parliament' started a simulated 'military coup' or revolution using airsoft guns? Run in right in the middle of 'official minutes' and hold everyone up?

Sorry, too much sugar in my oatmeal gets me all excited...
 
Actually, a North American Union wouldn't be so bad, provided that we impose OUR government in control over them, completely disbanding their governments. So if you're talking about conquest by agreement, what a concept - bring it on!!! Kinda doubt they'd go for it unfortunately. But if this pipe dream came true, this would oust the corrupt Mexican government and bring their resources into our economy. Mexico has lots of oil folks. And then I could go on hunting trips to Canada and take any gun I durn well pleased. All French Canadians would become indentured servants - their first assignment could be as my gun bearer on said hunting trips.
 
I'm not going to worry, Doug - you will be there to defend us against guys in funny uniforms.

you betcha!

What round do you use in your revolver for a Marxist Bozo?

you don't, you use a BB gun


Personally, I'm scared of Bozo.

I believe you.

On Supernatural tonight, the brothers will take on killer Bozos. Unfortunately, they don't have the magic revolver anymore.

I'm sure they'll think of something

I want the tinfoil hat smilie added to our set!!

it would be an improvement for you
 
Erosion

This will drag this nation down and end the Constitution. Socialism is already here,and now comes the Democratic nightmare of majority rule. It would be U.N. rules then for all. I did not own a gun until I "woke up" about this in 96. Now I want all I can get! Vote Independent or we all will be Interdependent on this system. Vote the bums out, if we can't, prosecute them, if we can't..........:mad:
 
Don't fret buckbuster,
Empires always collapse. We can't keep expanding the way we are economically and socially and expect to last much longer.
WE, that is the real people who make up these regions of what are now called the United States, might very well be there left standing in one way or another in the end.
Rome collapsed, but the regions that made it up survived to ultimately be their own countries or city-states. Including Italy herself. Rome still stands to this day.
Social engineering and political organizations aren't natural (mass immigration, social integration, redistribution of wealth), natural is community, family and culture. What the casualties are remains to be seen. The trick is for our (and other western cultures and even non western cultures like Mexico) culture and people to survive before the U.S./U.N/European Union fall in among themselves.
The sooner they collapse the better.
 
Last edited:
Doug.38PR...

Don't fret buckbuster,
Empires always collapse. We can't keep expanding the way we are economically and socially and expect to last much longer.
WE, that is the real people who make up these regions of what are now called the United States, might very well be there left standing in one way or another in the end.
Rome collapsed, but the regions that made it up survived to ultimately be their own countries or city-states. Including Italy herself. Rome still stands to this day.
Social engineering and political organizations aren't natural (mass immigration, social integration, redistribution of wealth), natural is community, family and culture. What the casualties are remains to be seen. The trick is for our (and other western cultures and even non western cultures like Mexico) culture and people to survive before the U.S./U.N/European Union fall in among themselves.
The sooner they collapse the better.


Would you agree that we NEED a collapse in order for things to settle out? On a seperate note, are you saying that with collapse each state will be more autonomous, thus changing the country in the sense that the feds will either be non-existant or very minimal? Sounds a lot like India, their states are so diverse that they're each like their own country.

Epyon
 
Back
Top