The Nanny State

John/az2

New member
The site:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_williams/19990922_xcwwi_the_nanny_.shtml

The article:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>The nanny state

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© 1999 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Worrying about bacteria, New Jersey banned restaurants from serving eggs sunny side up. The ban has since been lifted.
Some New Jersey localities have a ban on people pumping their own gasoline. Policemen issue citations for driving without a seatbelt. By law, new cars must be equipped with air bags. Federal law mandates that all new toilets flush using a paltry 1.6 gallons of water. Georgia's governor mandates that classical music be given to all new mothers so as to aid infant I.Q. development. California has banned smoking in bars.

Clinton wants a law passed banning smoking within 100 feet of a federal building. In parts of Ohio, children going trick-or-treating must obtain a special permit.

These intrusions and more were recently revealed by television journalist John Stossel on ABC's 20/20. The stated motivation behind this gross intrusion and criminalization of private behavior is to protect us from making unwise choices.

Stossel asked Ricardo Martinez, head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, why can't people at least have air bag on/off switches. Martinez responded by saying that society makes decisions about what benefits most people, and most people benefit from air bags. Stossel interviewed Yale University's Professor Kelley D. Brownell, director of the Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, who thinks Americans eat too many hamburgers and French fries. Brownell wants government to tax fatty foods and those with little nutritional content and use the proceeds to subsidize fruits, vegetables and other nutritious foods. He's suggested that some of the tax proceeds be used to build bike and hiking trails.

I'm wondering just when Americans are going to decide that we've had enough government meddling in our lives. It is nobody's business whether I eat eggs sunny side up, drive without wearing seat belts or pig out on hamburgers and French fries. I'd like someone to show me Congress' constitutional authority for the government protecting me from making unwise choices.

Those who believe government should be in the business of making us take care of ourselves should tell us where it all ends. Should government decide what time we go to bed? After all, sleep is vital to good health. Should government force us to exercise, read wholesome literature and bathe regularly?

The people who advocate a nanny government (a better term is Nazi government) are cowards. You say, "What do you mean, Williams?"

Take Brownell. If he doesn't want me to eat that Big Mac and French fries, let him walk up to my table and remove them from my plate. He wants no part of doing that because he doesn't want to meet his maker this year, so he prefers using the brutal forces of government.

When I was young, bullies used to pick on me, take food off my lunch tray and otherwise harass me. That's until I followed the advice of my stepfather, who told me that if you let a bully get away with one thing, the next day it's going to be something else and the following day something else again. He told me that the bullying won't stop until I decide to stand up and fight.

He said that even if I lose the fight, the next time I'm bullied, stand up and fight again. Let the bully know that when he bullies, win, lose or draw, he has a fight on his hands. Eventually he will stop.

I think Americans should employ my Dad's advice. As long as we stand as lambs before the slaughter, you can bet that there'll be no end to Congress' bureaucratic stooges bullying us.
[/quote]

Emphasis mine.

------------------
John/az

"The middle of the road between the extremes of good and evil, is evil. When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..." RKBA!

www.quixtar.com
referal #2005932
 
I remember a few years ago when somebody first predicted that big government busybodies would soon be calling for restrictions on fatty and unhealthy foods; of course, the pro-gov't side claimed that was ridiculous, couldn't ever happen, don't be silly. Now we know who was right, and who was lying. Sounds pretty similar to the history of gun control, doesn't it?

There is no area in our lives these would-be mommies will not intrude. Safe sex education (no mention of unwanted pregnancy, just the illusory spectre of AIDS), seat belt laws, helmet laws, laws against self-medication, laws against self-defense, laws against suicide,etc., all are intrusions and violations of the right to privacy.

A question looms: Who owns our bodies? To put it another way: Does the individual own his body, and is therefore responsible for it? or: Does society know best, and therefore have the right to tell the individual what to do with his body?

If you think the government has any say in how you care for your own body, then you believe in slavery, since you obviously believe society has some title to your body.

So, who owns your body?

------------------
"...the probability of the people in power being individuals who would dislike the possession and exercise of power is on a level with the probability that an extremely tender-hearted person would get the job of whipping-master in a slave plantation."
Prof. Frank H. Knight
 
Interesting point about cowardice. I may use that. On the other hand, if I do I'll probably be dismissed as a raving gun nut. But at least YOU got to use it among people who pay attention to what language really means . . .
 
Back
Top