I already posted about this once, but I think it might be buried where the original topic doesn't generate as much interest.
This in regards to the the defensive shooting of McDonalds employee Willis Lee. One of the media sources in Houston claimed that Mr. Lee had been fired for violation of policy that employees were not permitted to carry.
In an email discussion about this an interesting concept developed. The media claimed to millions of people that a man lost his source of income for sticking up his rights and protecting the lives of others. It was a lie. But, what seed of thought was planted by this media in making that claim?
Sprig
(Hey, I really really hope this generates some replies. I really want the feedback even though I know this has kinda been touched on before. In this case, the lie is blatant, but the results of this lie are ??? )
This in regards to the the defensive shooting of McDonalds employee Willis Lee. One of the media sources in Houston claimed that Mr. Lee had been fired for violation of policy that employees were not permitted to carry.
In an email discussion about this an interesting concept developed. The media claimed to millions of people that a man lost his source of income for sticking up his rights and protecting the lives of others. It was a lie. But, what seed of thought was planted by this media in making that claim?
Sprig
(Hey, I really really hope this generates some replies. I really want the feedback even though I know this has kinda been touched on before. In this case, the lie is blatant, but the results of this lie are ??? )