Former Senator John Danforth, who has been appointed to head this latest spectacle, pardon me, this investigatioin, had earlier noted, with respect to this new investigation as follows. The quote is not exact, but his comments are a matter of record, that "he intended to look into whether there had been a cover-up, and whether federal officers had killed anyone". Danforth also said that he would not be looking into or at "judgement calls".
Looking at information and admissions recently made, there remains no question whatever as to the fact that there was, and still is, a cover-up in operation. As to the possibility that federal officers had killed people, it is quite possible that some of the ATF agents were felled by "friendly fire", to say the very least.
Re not looking at "judgement calls" some of which were horrendously bad, the writer sees the following in this. If they were to be properly examined, errors would come into view, which in the future, could be avoided, having been recognized. Since these judgemewnt calls, some of which were really terrible, are not to be examined, the errors therein will likely be REPEATED at some future juncture, and the band will most surely play on. If I do the senator an injustice, sorry about that, I merely call them as I see them.
Also, heard on the radio today, that the federal government, DOJ, is beinging suit against the tobacco industry, claiming that for some 45 or so years, the industry had engaged in a deliberate scheme of deception. Might this be sort of similar to what DOJ in particular, and The Clinton Administration in general have been party to respecting WACO and the goings on that there took place? One wonders about that sort of thing.
Looking at information and admissions recently made, there remains no question whatever as to the fact that there was, and still is, a cover-up in operation. As to the possibility that federal officers had killed people, it is quite possible that some of the ATF agents were felled by "friendly fire", to say the very least.
Re not looking at "judgement calls" some of which were horrendously bad, the writer sees the following in this. If they were to be properly examined, errors would come into view, which in the future, could be avoided, having been recognized. Since these judgemewnt calls, some of which were really terrible, are not to be examined, the errors therein will likely be REPEATED at some future juncture, and the band will most surely play on. If I do the senator an injustice, sorry about that, I merely call them as I see them.
Also, heard on the radio today, that the federal government, DOJ, is beinging suit against the tobacco industry, claiming that for some 45 or so years, the industry had engaged in a deliberate scheme of deception. Might this be sort of similar to what DOJ in particular, and The Clinton Administration in general have been party to respecting WACO and the goings on that there took place? One wonders about that sort of thing.
