"The Great Thanksgiving Hoax"

Darthmaum

New member
Hi all,
Here's a story to tell your children. We need to remind people that if we continue to head toward socialism, the same things will happen.

The Great Thanksgiving Hoax
by Richard J. Marbury

Each year at this time school children all over America are taught the official Thanksgiving story, and newspapers, radio, TV, and magazines devote vast amounts of time and space to it. It is all very colorful and fascinating.

It is also very deceiving. This official story is nothing like what really happened. It is a fairy tale, a whitewashed and sanitized collection of half-truths which divert attention away from Thanksgiving's real meaning.

The official story has the pilgrims boarding the Mayflower, coming to America and establishing the Plymouth colony in the winter of 1620-21. This first winter is hard, and half the colonists die. But the survivors are hard working and tenacious, and they learn new farming techniques from the Indians. The harvest of 1621 is bountiful. The Pilgrims hold a celebration,
and give thanks to God. They are grateful for the wonderful new abundant land He has given them.

The official story then has the Pilgrims living more or less happily ever after, each year repeating the first Thanksgiving. Other early colonies also have hard times at first, but they soon prosper and adopt the annual tradition of giving thanks for this prosperous new land called America. The problem with this official story is that the harvest of 1621 was not bountiful, nor were the colonists hardworking or tenacious. 1621 was a famine year and many of the colonists were lazy thieves.

In his 'History of Plymouth Plantation,' the governor of the colony, William Bradford, reported that the colonists went hungry for years, because they refused to work in the fields. They preferred instead to steal food. He says the colony was riddled with "corruption," and with "confusion and
discontent." The crops were small because "much was stolen both by night and
day, before it became scarce eatable."

In the harvest feasts of 1621 and 1622, "all had their hungry bellies filled," but only briefly. The prevailing condition during those years was not the abundance the official story claims, it was famine and death. The first "Thanksgiving" was not so much a celebration as it was the last meal
of condemned men.

But in subsequent years something changes. The harvest of 1623 was different. Suddenly, "instead of famine now God gave them plenty," Bradford wrote, "and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God." Thereafter, he wrote, "any general
want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day." In fact, in 1624, so much food was produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting corn.

What happened?

After the poor harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, "they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop." They began to question their form of economic organization.
This had required that "all profits & benefits that are got by trade, working, fishing, or any other means" were to be placed in the common stock of the colony, and that, "all such persons as are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions out of the common
stock." A person was to put into the common stock all he could, and take out only what he needed.

This "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" was an early form of socialism, and it is why the Pilgrims were starving. Bradford writes that "young men that are most able and fit for labor and service" complained about being forced to "spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children." Also, "the strong, or man of
parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak." So the young and strong refused to work and the total amount of food produced was never adequate.

To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each household a parcel of land and told them they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw fit. In other words, he replaced
socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines. Many early groups of colonists set up socialist states, all with the same terrible results. At Jamestown, established in 1607, out of every shipload
of settlers that arrived, less than half would survive their first twelve months in America. Most of the work was being done by only one-fifth of the men, the other four-fifths choosing to be parasites. In the winter of 1609-10, called "The Starving Time," the population fell from five-hundred
to sixty.

Then the Jamestown colony was converted to a free market, and the results were every bit as dramatic as those at Plymouth. In 1614, Colony Secretary Ralph Hamor wrote that after the switch there was "plenty of food, which every man by his own industry may easily and doth procure." He said that when the socialist system had prevailed, "we reaped not so much corn from the labors of thirty men as three men have done for themselves now." Before these free markets were established, the colonists had nothing for which to be thankful. They were in the same situation as Ethiopians are today, and for the same reasons. But after free markets were established, the resulting abundance was so dramatic that the annual Thanksgiving
celebrations became common throughout the colonies, and in 1863, Thanksgiving became a national holiday.

Thus the real reason for Thanksgiving deleted from the official story, is: Socialism does not work; the one and only source of abundance is free markets, and we thank God we live in a country where we can still have them.



I received this story from an email list I am a member of. I think it's an interesting (and sobering) twist on the traditional story of the early settlers. This Thanksgiving, let's pray that our freedoms will continue to be upheld, that socialism will not descend down upon us, despite the current trend in that direction. As in Schmit's thread: God is over all: Thank Him for our freedoms. To celebrate further, my husband and I plan on attending a gunshow on Saturday! ;)

Happy Thanksgiving all! :)




------------------
"Liberty or death, What we so proudly hail... Once you provoke Her, rattling of Her tail- Never begins it, NEVER- But once engaged never surrenders, showing the fangs of rage. DON'T TREAD ON ME!!
 
Thanks Darthmaum.

That is the predicament which was never resolved in any communist country. I call it communism because no country that followed the teachings of Marx ever attained a true socialistic state. The predicament is that socialism is based on the principal that within an enlightened society, man will care for his fellow man much like he would care for his own family. The failure is that socialism could not instill such noble belief in the common man. Face it: Most normal men will always care for their immediately family before they assume care for another. You work hard to leave a legacy for your children, not society as a whole.

Socialism's concept of sharing and caring for one's fellow is not new. I would venture to say that some of the teachings of Christ were along this line. If we were all in a Christ-like state of mind, we could achieve it. However, Socialism, a godless concept, seeks that imposition of Christ's charitable and loving spirit without the spirituality offered by Christ (am I making sense?). You can't separate the religion from the spirituality.

In light of what you've shared with us, that the Colony at Plymouth nearly succumbed to starvation is not at all surprising. The experiment failed then as it has failed in our times.

------------------
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt
 
what I find amusing in the story is the "confusion" and "corruption" that the governor observed. I suspect that the colonists (especially the leaders) assumed that social and economic well-being would be secured automatically due to their utopian plans.

planned societies, whether of political or religious bent, always seem to end up with severe problems. there is something in human nature that is triggered in those situations, and resistance to "the correct way" is inevitably met with violence. domestic peace is related to domestic tolerance and freedoms.

an ironic thing is that the Puritans left England because of religio-social persecution, yet upon settling in New England, started their own persecutions.
 
Back
Top