The Brady Bill is Successful

Waitone

New member
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2000/11/30/204447.shtml

70% Decline in Gun Dealers in 7 Years

NewsMax.com Wires
Friday, Dec. 1, 2000

WASHINGTON (UPI) – The number of gun dealers in the United States has dropped more than 70 percent since 1993, when the Brady Bill was passed, a survey by Violence Policy Center said Thursday.
The study found much of the decline was due to the reduction in the number of "kitchen-table" gun dealers who sell guns out of their homes rather than storefronts.

"This study shows, pure and simple, that the Brady Bill and other gun dealer regulations worked," Thom Mannard, executive director of Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence, said at a Chicago news conference.

"Not only has the Brady Law stopped criminals from buying guns, it has reduced the indiscriminate home sales of guns, especially from kitchen tables and garages."

The number of gun dealers fell from 245,628 in 1994 – more than 74 percent of them kitchen-table dealers – to 69,591 this year. Currently, kitchen-table dealers represent 56 percent of gun dealers.

Soaring Fees Put Dealers out of Business

Some of the decline likely is attributable to higher licensing fees, which went from $10 a year to $200 for the first three years and then $90 for every three-year period thereafter under the Brady Law. Also credited (or blamed, depending on whether you oppose or support Second Amendment rights) was the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, requiring licensees to submit pictures and fingerprints with their applications to certify compliance with all state and local laws.

Violence Policy Center recommended the federal government require all gun dealers to operate out of storefronts and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms be given the authority to suspend a dealer's license and inspect gun shops for violations. It also recommended loopholes allowing dealers to divert inventory to private collections be closed and that dealers be required to make sure their inventories are securely stored.
 
They are trying to save the Brady Law from the massive hits it has gotten as studies from Northwestern University (Jacobs&Potter), Georgetown (Cook&Ludwig), and the General Accounting Office have all slammed it.

Brady has nothing to do with all the FFLs forced to relinquish their licenses via coercion, increased fees, or enforcement of zoning laws.

Remember back in 1968 that they said the Gun Control Act would not be used to do this.

They lied.

Rick
 
They changed their minds

What's wrong with selling guns from your home? Well, nothing in 1968. They told us that they just wanted to keep tabs on who was selling them so that criminals could not get guns. They lied.

Dennis, the Georgetown Cook/Ludwig study was the same one you mention in JAMA. Cook and Ludwig are proto anti-gunners so it must have hurt them terribly to say that Brady had no affect on homicide. But, of course, like any other liberal, their findings of no affect allowed them to say that we needed to spend more money on Brady by "closing the loopholes."
 
Back
Top